<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga-abuse] Number of complaints outstanding
Hi Kristy
> Reading through Leah's post - I notice she is asking for Kent to be warned
> due to him slandering the GA as a whole. The more I re-read and consider,
> the more I feel it is appropriate for Kent to be warned against this
> behavior. Does anyone else agree with me - or am I learning that a
> general slander against the whole group (or a part of it) is not in
> consideration for warnings, suspensions, etc. Whatever is fine, I just
> need a little help...
My feeling is that we are going to run into huge critcism from the "free
speech" lobby whenever we suspend people. I'd prefer to do it when the case
is very tight.
Kent abused the process when he proposed "joke" motions and falsified Jeff
Williams identity to second them. I suggest we suspend him for that.
However, I would think that a warning for flaming is in order in this case.
Regards
Patrick
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|