Re: [ga-abuse] Number of complaints outstanding

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

Good morning.  New York was fabulous!!

Bruce, I disagree.  If Kent has already been warned; then now is his time 
for suspension.

Also, I think I misunderstood your comment - are you commenting that the 
complaints don't amount to much or that they don't amount to much because 
they are made by Leah & Eric?  Please clarify, thanks!!

:)

~k

At 06:34 AM 4/30/2001 -0500, Bruce James wrote:
> >>As you will see, I have consistently advocated warnings for all the cases
>where I found offense, except for Eric Dierker, who I think has had enough
>warnings; "one warning before ban" would seem to be a reasonable policy.<<
>
>I agree with the *One Warning* policy.
>
>Eric Dierker has been spoken to off the GA list in private emails by several
>people to calm down. If he acts up again, a two week ban should be placed on
>him.
>
>IMHO..the 2 complaints about Kent do not amount to much. (from Leah & Eric)
>
>/Bruce
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@Alvestrand.no>
>To: <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
>Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 03:13
>Subject: [ga-abuse] Number of complaints outstanding
>
>
>At the moment, I count 42 outstanding complaints.
>I still have some homework to do (finding the archive URLs for the last 20
>or so complaints), but after that, I will, as promised, ship the list to
>the ga-abuse list, acting as M1.
>I would suggest that the other moderators pick one complained-about name
>(there are 13 names in the complained-about list) to pass judgment on, and
>write a summary of all outstanding complaints about that name, with
>judgment.
>(a brief note saying "I will take NN" to the ga-abuse list might be a Good
>Thing - it can take time to write the note).
>
>Some numbers were interesting, though:
>
>- William Walsh and Eric Dierker led the number of complaints against them,
>    unsurprisingly, with 10 and 11 complaints respectively.
>
>- 23 of the complaints (more than half) were generated by Patrick Corliss.
>    The runners-up are Dave Crocker and Joe Kelsey, with 5 each.
>
>As you will see, I have consistently advocated warnings for all the cases
>where I found offense, except for Eric Dierker, who I think has had enough
>warnings; "one warning before ban" would seem to be a reasonable policy.
>
>                 Harald