Re: [ga-abuse] Number of complaints outstanding

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

Hi Kristy

> This works for me:  issue a warning for flaming and when we deal with the
> joke motion complaints he will receive his first suspension.
>
> All good?
>
>   (if yes; then I wait 24 hours to make sure and finally write the note &
> submit it to ga-abuse and Kent, and let Leah & Eric know Kent has received
> a warning as requested by them?)
>
> :)

I agree except that we need to treat cases individually on their merits as
far as possible.  Unless otherwise specified in the rules, I feel that the
suspension is justified on its own.  My view is that abusing the process of
motions, and forging posts, thoroughly undermines the integrity of the GA as
a body.

We also ought to deal with the matters on a FCFS basis.

I'd keep the notes very short as the more we write, the more open we are to
criticism.  I'd not trust anyone to maintain confidentiality in these
circumstances.

Does that resolve all matters against Kent?  What about the flaming against
Michael Froomkin which triggered off quite a flaming match on its own?

Regards
Patrick