Re: [ga-abuse] Number of complaints outstanding

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

At 05:38 AM 5/1/2001 +1000, Co-Chair, DNSO GA wrote:
>Hi Kristy
>
> > Reading through Leah's post - I notice she is asking for Kent to be warned
> > due to him slandering the GA as a whole.  The more I re-read and consider,
> > the more I feel it is appropriate for Kent to be warned against this
> > behavior.  Does anyone else agree with me - or am I learning  that a
> > general slander against the whole group (or a part of it) is not in
> > consideration for warnings, suspensions, etc.  Whatever is fine, I just
> > need a little help...
>
>My feeling is that we are going to run into huge critcism from the "free
>speech" lobby whenever we suspend people.  I'd prefer to do it when the case
>is very tight.
>
>Kent abused the process when he proposed "joke" motions and falsified Jeff
>Williams identity to second them.  I suggest we suspend him for that.
>
>However, I would think that a warning for flaming is in order in this case.
>
>Regards
>Patrick


This works for me:  issue a warning for flaming and when we deal with the 
joke motion complaints he will receive his first suspension.

All good?

  (if yes; then I wait 24 hours to make sure and finally write the note & 
submit it to ga-abuse and Kent, and let Leah & Eric know Kent has received 
a warning as requested by them?)

:)