Re: [ga-abuse] Number of complaints outstanding

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

Fine,  thanks!

Would someone communicate this to Leah & Eric - or is that not appropriate?

:)

~k


At 10:16 AM 4/30/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>If Kent has been warned, then I would agree.
>
>What Kent said was really an attack on the whole GA, not *me*.
>This was not a *personal* attack. (I have a very thick skin)
>
>The person(s) making the complaint(s) does not matter to me, they are all
>equal!
>
>Since I wrote the item he respond to, I should not make a *judgment*.
>
>/Bruce
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kristy McKee" <k@widgital.com>
>To: <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
>Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:36
>Subject: Re: [ga-abuse] Number of complaints outstanding
>
>
>Good morning.  New York was fabulous!!
>
>Bruce, I disagree.  If Kent has already been warned; then now is his time
>for suspension.
>
>Also, I think I misunderstood your comment - are you commenting that the
>complaints don't amount to much or that they don't amount to much because
>they are made by Leah & Eric?  Please clarify, thanks!!
>
>:)
>
>~k
>
>At 06:34 AM 4/30/2001 -0500, Bruce James wrote:
> > >>As you will see, I have consistently advocated warnings for all the
>cases
> >where I found offense, except for Eric Dierker, who I think has had enough
> >warnings; "one warning before ban" would seem to be a reasonable policy.<<
> >
> >I agree with the *One Warning* policy.
> >
> >Eric Dierker has been spoken to off the GA list in private emails by
>several
> >people to calm down. If he acts up again, a two week ban should be placed
>on
> >him.
> >
> >IMHO..the 2 complaints about Kent do not amount to much. (from Leah & Eric)
> >
> >/Bruce
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@Alvestrand.no>
> >To: <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
> >Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 03:13
> >Subject: [ga-abuse] Number of complaints outstanding
> >
> >
> >At the moment, I count 42 outstanding complaints.
> >I still have some homework to do (finding the archive URLs for the last 20
> >or so complaints), but after that, I will, as promised, ship the list to
> >the ga-abuse list, acting as M1.
> >I would suggest that the other moderators pick one complained-about name
> >(there are 13 names in the complained-about list) to pass judgment on, and
> >write a summary of all outstanding complaints about that name, with
> >judgment.
> >(a brief note saying "I will take NN" to the ga-abuse list might be a Good
> >Thing - it can take time to write the note).
> >
> >Some numbers were interesting, though:
> >
> >- William Walsh and Eric Dierker led the number of complaints against them,
> >    unsurprisingly, with 10 and 11 complaints respectively.
> >
> >- 23 of the complaints (more than half) were generated by Patrick Corliss.
> >    The runners-up are Dave Crocker and Joe Kelsey, with 5 each.
> >
> >As you will see, I have consistently advocated warnings for all the cases
> >where I found offense, except for Eric Dierker, who I think has had enough
> >warnings; "one warning before ban" would seem to be a reasonable policy.
> >
> >                 Harald