<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga-abuse] M1 against Kent Crispin
M1: Alexander Svensson
Against: Kent Crispin, kent@songbird.com
Complainants: Joop Teernstra, terastra@terabytz.co.nz
Complainant Comments: "These childish vendetta's (or are
they deliberate provocations?) have to be stopped, if the
GA is ever going to get anywhere."
Date: 14-Aug-01
Message:
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00497.html
Grounds: Personal attack
Recommendation: Warning
M1 Comment:
-------------------------------------------------------
Hello Kent,
The list monitors for the General Assembly (GA) of the DNSO
have issued this warning to you concerning complaints received
about the following post:
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00497.html
According to the rules for participation in the GA of the DNSO
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-ga-rules.html
the messages must observe a minimum of decorum, including:
- Not indulging in personal attacks, insults or slander
- Not using offensive language
In the posting mentioned above you are referring to
Milton Mueller's statements as "characteristically inaccurate
and insulting". Please refrain from such personal sideswipes.
Best regards,
[Kristy or Alexander for the list monitors]
-------------------------------------------------------
M2:
M2 Comment:
Action:
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:42:48 -0700
> From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Documentation request
> Mail-Followup-To: ga@dnso.org
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
> Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:28:41AM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> > Denying a proposal because one doesn't like the people supporting it is not
> > politics of any honorable variety. It is slimey, subjective, and personal.
> > It also doesn't serve the best interests of the ICANN, in the long run.
>
> It's interesting how you take Miltons characteristically inaccurate and
> insulting statement and run with it.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|