[ga-abuse] M1 against Andy Gardner

[Alexander Svensson <svensson@icannchannel.de>]

M1: Alexander Svensson
Against: Andy Gardner, andy@navigator.co.nz
Complainants:  Thomas Roessler, roessler@does-not-exist.org;
Joop Teernstra, terastra@terabytz.co.nz
Complainant Comments: (2): "Clearly offensive posting, without
_any_ reasonable content.";  (1+2) "go too far, imho."
Date:  14-Aug-01
Messages:
(1) http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00477.html
(2) http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00511.html

Grounds: Personal attack, insult, offensive language
Recommendation:
Warning about (2). While (1) may be somewhat close to slander
and irrelevance to the GA business, it's a satirical
posting which does not constitute a /personal/ attack.

M1 Comment: Here's my warning proposal, since Andy
seems not to have received a warning before and our
custom is to warn first and then suspend. I note that
the coarse language here makes me think about when such
a warning is appropriate and when a behaviour is so
inexcusable that a two weeks suspension is justified
in the first place.

-------------------------------------------------------
Andy,

The list monitors for the General Assembly (GA) of the DNSO
have issued this warning to you concerning complaints received
about the following post:

http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00511.html

According to the rules for participation in the GA of the DNSO
  http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-ga-rules.html
the messages must observe a minimum of decorum, including:
  - Not indulging in personal attacks, insults or slander
  - Not using offensive language

In the posting mentioned above you are making a personal
attack on another GA member ("pricks like you"), using
coarse, derogatory language. If this happens again, your
GA posting privileges will be suspended.

Regards,
[Kristy or Alexander for the list monitors]

-------------------------------------------------------

M2:
M2 Comment:
Action:


> From: Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 17:26:01 -0500
> Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Documentation request
>
> At 6:09 PM -0400 14/8/01, Ken Stubbs wrote:
>
>>i am still waiting for concrete "proposals"
>
> What is REALLY annoying(and saddening) about what has become of ICANN is
> that pricks like you are now firmly in control.
>
>
> --
> Andrew P. Gardner
> barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
> We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
> Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com