Re: [ga-abuse] decorum?

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

On 11:51 15/08/01 +0200, Alexander Svensson said:

>Hello Joop,
>
>thanks for your mail! Unfortunately, the last one
>seems to have arrived cut-off:

Ach, ja.

I meant to add the  posting of Crispin with the personal sideswipe to 
Milton Mueller.("characteristically inaccurate and
insulting ")
These childish vendetta's (or are they deliberate provocations?) have to be 
stopped, if the GA is ever going to get anywhere.
*****************
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:42:48 -0700
From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Documentation request
Mail-Followup-To: ga@dnso.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org

On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:28:41AM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
 > Denying a proposal because one doesn't like the people supporting it is not
 > politics of any honorable variety. It is slimey, subjective, and personal.
 > It also doesn't serve the best interests of the ICANN, in the long run.

It's interesting how you take Miltons characteristically inaccurate and
insulting statement and run with it.

<snip>
*********************
-Joop