Re: [ga-abuse] M1 against Kent Crispin

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

At 02:50 PM 8/15/2001 +0200, Alexander Svensson wrote:


>M1: Alexander Svensson
>Against: Kent Crispin, kent@songbird.com
>Complainants:  Joop Teernstra, terastra@terabytz.co.nz
>Complainant Comments: "These childish vendetta's (or are
>they deliberate provocations?) have to be stopped, if the
>GA is ever going to get anywhere."
>Date:  14-Aug-01
>Message:
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00497.html
>
>Grounds: Personal attack
>Recommendation: Warning
>
>M1 Comment:
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Hello Kent,
>
>The list monitors for the General Assembly (GA) of the DNSO
>have issued this warning to you concerning complaints received
>about the following post:
>
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00497.html
>
>According to the rules for participation in the GA of the DNSO
>   http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-ga-rules.html
>the messages must observe a minimum of decorum, including:
>   - Not indulging in personal attacks, insults or slander
>   - Not using offensive language
>
>In the posting mentioned above you are referring to
>Milton Mueller's statements as "characteristically inaccurate
>and insulting". Please refrain from such personal sideswipes.
>
>Best regards,
>[Kristy or Alexander for the list monitors]
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>
>M2:  Kristy McKee
>M2 Comment: Kent has already received two warnings for this: it is 
>absolutely time for him to be suspended.
>Action: Suspension Two Weeks
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:42:48 -0700
> > From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
> > To: ga@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Documentation request
> > Mail-Followup-To: ga@dnso.org
> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
> > Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:28:41AM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> >  > Denying a proposal because one doesn't like the people supporting it 
> is not
> >  > politics of any honorable variety. It is slimey, subjective, and 
> personal.
> >  > It also doesn't serve the best interests of the ICANN, in the long run.
> >
> > It's interesting how you take Miltons characteristically inaccurate and
> > insulting statement and run with it.