[ga-abuse] M2 Against Eric Dierker

[Alexander Svensson <svensson@icannchannel.de>]

> M1:  Kristy McKee
> Date:  8/29/01
> Against:  Eric Dierker, eric@hi-tek.com
> Complainant:  Kent Crispin, kent@songbird.com
> Complainant Comment:  I wish to register a complaint about the attached
> message.  Phrases like "criminally a misrepresentation at least", "you
> blather on", "tantamount to complicity" etc cannot be construed as anything
> other than personal attack.
>
> URL:  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00902.html
>
> Injury:  Personal Attack
> Action:  Warning
> Comment:  This discussion between Mr. Walsh and Mr. Dierker was
> hostile.  Both engaged in personal attacks and some of the messages lack
> relevance to the business of the GA.

M2: Alexander Svensson
Comment: Agreed, it is a personal attack.
Action:  (Strong) warning (unless it's pointless due to
action on other pending complaints)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
> M1:  Kristy McKee
> Date:  8/29/01
> Against:  Eric Dierker, eric@hi-tek.com
> Complainant:  William Walsh, william@userfriendly.com
> Complainant Comment:  This is why moderators should be free to act
> independently.  How long as you going to subject the list to this kind of
> abuse before acting? The rules NEVER indicated that moderators had to act
> by committee, this is something you guys created.  All it takes is for you
> moderators to start acting on your own.  Same violation as before, he is
> asking to be removed, give him what he wants.
>
> URL:  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00902.html
>
> Injury:  Personal Attack; however, that is not what WXW is complaining
> about.  His complaint is about the LMCs process.  This is a discussion for
> the ga-rules list.  Also Mr. Walsh's response to Eric's message should be
> noted:  "Get some Facts, Eric. You obviously have no knowledge how the
> systems in question work, when you do, come back and we'll discuss it
> intelligently."
> [http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00904.html]  This is a personal
> attack only.
> Action:  Ignore

M2: Alexander Svensson
Comment: "Same violation as before" seems to indicate
that William Walsh is complaining about the previous
alleged violation: another personal attack. If someone
just sends us the URL, we should reach the same action
as we do when we receive a lengthy, heated explanation.
Action: This complaint is already dealt with, see above:
(Strong) warning.