<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga-abuse] Abuse complaint re Russ Smith
Dear Bill,
thanks for your complaint. Russ Smith has received
a warning about his behaviour and will be suspended
if there are further list rule violations.
Best regards,
/// Alexander
> I wish to complain about the posting conduct of Russ Smith (aka
> "admin"),
> based upon the following three emails he posted:
> 1.
> Subject:
> RE: [ga] Re: Reconsideration
> Date:
> Tue, 7 Aug 2001 23:33:42 -0400
> From:
> admin@consumer.net (admin)
> To:
> "M. Stuart Lynn" <lynn@icann.org>, <DannyYounger@cs.com>,
> <ga@dnso.org>
> You are lying. It is unbelievable that you are blatantly lying like
> this on this list.
> _____
> 2.
> Subject:
> RE: [ga] Re: Reconsideration
> Date:
> Wed, 8 Aug 2001 08:01:25 -0400
> From:
> admin@consumer.net (admin)
> To:
> "M. Stuart Lynn" <lynn@icann.org>, <DannyYounger@cs.com>
> CC: <ga@dnso.org>
> Why are you reposting information that you know to be false?
> Why don't you try posting the truth?
> You are such an unbelivable liar and a fraud.
> _______
> 3.
> Subject:
> RE: [ga] CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS REJECT ICANN'S ONE ROOT 'POLICY'
> Date:
> Thu, 9 Aug 2001 22:31:55 -0400
> From:
> admin@consumer.net (admin)
> To:
> <ga@dnso.org>
>>A Watchdog Committee has been formed to police the nomination process
> to
> help detect and cure
>> any instances of fraudulent activity in connection with the nomination
> process.
>> The members to the Watchdog Committee in 2001 election are:
>> Roberto Gaetano
>> Harald Alvestrand
>> Kent Crispin
>> Dany Vandromme
>> Alexander Svensson
>> Izumi Aizu
> So where do report fraud in the chossing of the watchdog committee???
> Hey, i think I will go drive around the beltway a few times as it is
> more
> constructive than this BS.
> _____
> 4.
> Subject:
> RE: [ga] who handles registrar complaints?
> Date:
> Thu, 9 Aug 2001 12:38:48 -0400
> From:
> admin@consumer.net (admin)
> To:
> "Eric Dierker" <eric@hi-tek.com>
> CC:
> "[GA]" <ga@dnso.org>, <halloran@icann.org>, <touton@icann.org>,
> <mclaughlin@pobox.com>, <michael@palage.com>
>>Damn fine question!!
> You see that doesn't matter. I don't bow down before the greatness of
> the
> ICANN staff and kiss their asses. They then use that as an excuse not
> to
> answer, ignore the question, etc. The content of the question does not
> matter, it is who asked it. Of course this type of activity violates
> the
> agreements ICANN has with DOC to operate in an open and transparent
> manner.
> I treat ICANN staff the same way they treat individual domain holders
> and
> they don't seem to like it. I suggest they quit if they don't like it.
> Russ Smith
> _____
> Such name calling ("liar") and use of language should not be permitted.
> Bill Lovell
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|