[ga-abuse] Abuse complaint re Russ Smith

["William S. Lovell" <wsl@cerebalaw.com>]

I wish to complain about the posting conduct of Russ Smith (aka
"admin"),
based upon the following three emails he posted:
1.
Subject:
        RE: [ga] Re: Reconsideration
   Date:
        Tue, 7 Aug 2001 23:33:42 -0400
   From:
        admin@consumer.net (admin)
     To:
        "M. Stuart Lynn" <lynn@icann.org>, <DannyYounger@cs.com>,
<ga@dnso.org>

You are lying.  It is unbelievable that you are blatantly lying like
this on this list.
_____
2.
Subject:
        RE: [ga] Re: Reconsideration
   Date:
        Wed, 8 Aug 2001 08:01:25 -0400
   From:
        admin@consumer.net (admin)
     To:
        "M. Stuart Lynn" <lynn@icann.org>, <DannyYounger@cs.com>
    CC: <ga@dnso.org>

Why are you reposting information that you know to be false?

Why don't you try posting the truth?

You are such an unbelivable liar and a fraud.
 _______
3.
Subject:
        RE: [ga] CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS REJECT ICANN'S ONE ROOT 'POLICY'
   Date:
        Thu, 9 Aug 2001 22:31:55 -0400
   From:
        admin@consumer.net (admin)
     To:
        <ga@dnso.org>

>A Watchdog Committee has been formed to police the nomination process
to
help detect and cure
> any instances of fraudulent activity in connection with the nomination

process.

>     The members to the Watchdog Committee in 2001 election are:
>          Roberto Gaetano
>         Harald Alvestrand
>          Kent Crispin
>          Dany Vandromme
>          Alexander Svensson
>          Izumi Aizu

So where do report fraud in the chossing of the watchdog  committee???

Hey, i think I will go drive around the beltway a few times as it is
more
constructive than this BS.
_____
4.

Subject:
        RE: [ga] who handles registrar complaints?
   Date:
        Thu, 9 Aug 2001 12:38:48 -0400
   From:
        admin@consumer.net (admin)
     To:
        "Eric Dierker" <eric@hi-tek.com>
    CC:
        "[GA]" <ga@dnso.org>, <halloran@icann.org>, <touton@icann.org>,
<mclaughlin@pobox.com>, <michael@palage.com>

>Damn fine question!!

You see that doesn't matter.  I don't bow down before the greatness of
the
ICANN staff and kiss their asses.  They then use that as an excuse not
to
answer, ignore the question, etc.  The content of the question does not
matter, it is who asked it.  Of course this type of activity violates
the
agreements ICANN has with DOC to operate in an open and transparent
manner.
I treat ICANN staff the same way they treat individual domain holders
and
they don't seem to like it.  I suggest they quit if they don't like it.

Russ Smith
_____

Such name calling ("liar") and use of language should not be permitted.

Bill Lovell