[ga-abuse] Re: [ga-rules] Incorporating Sublists Into [ga-full]

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Eric and all,

  Eric is exactly right here.  Why are people being selectively censored
yet again without recourse or good reason.  The use of sublists are a good
idea in some respects but to use as a filter to the ga-full or the GA with
rules list is inconsistent and a form of CENSORSHIP.

Eric Dierker wrote:

> No Patrick that would be improper in that being in compliance with the rules
> should not require a vote or consensus.  Please refer to;
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-ga-rules.html
> Specifically; **ACCESS TO UNFILTERED LIST
> -------------------------
> There exists an open list that can be subscribed to: ga-full@dnso.org.
> This will get *all* mail sent to ga@dnso.org, no restrictions (except for
> possibly technical restrictions like message size or size of header).
> It will be archived by the DNSO.
> Public access to the archive will be granted as much as possible; there may be
> legal reasons (e.g. rules against republication of slander) that require closing
>
> some parts of the archive.
>
> The existence of this list will make it possible to have independent
> verification
> of what the filtering function does.*****
>
> Whether you did it by blunder or intention you specifically violated this rule
> in establishing the sub-lists.  Auerbach, Rony, Sondow and several others quit
> this list because of censoring and now you are doing it with regaled aplomb by
> use of the sub lists and by any count are killing the GA.
>
> You might want to read all these rules as there is no provision for suspension
> for over posting but only upon a determination of lack of respect for posting
> limits, none of the four suspended has shown this, in fact quite the opposite.
>
> Sincerely,
> Eric
>
> Please consider this a formal application for reconsideration to the Monitors as
> they we clearly laboring under a false impression as to what the rules required
> regarding over posting.  There is only a mandate to respect and in my particular
> case that was evidenced in the decision against me itself.
>
> Patrick Corliss wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:29:08 -0700, Eric Dierker wrote:
> > Re: [ga] Message from the Chair - List Rules
> >
> > > As can be seen through this post, the sublists need to resolve to the
> > > ga-full and we need to be able to post only to the ga-full should we
> > > desire.
> >
> > Hi Eric
> >
> > I have always agreed that the sublists should be incorporated into the
> > [ga-full] mailing list.  Can I refer this proposal to the [ga-rules] mailing
> > list?
> >
> > I'd welcome the views of members.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Patrick Corliss
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208