<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga-abuse] complaint against Walsh
The following post is a slanderous personal attack.
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc07/msg02479.html
Substantiation is promised, but this promise remains of
course unfulfilled. (because it cannot be found)
I have never subverted the will of the majority of the idno members.
If Eric Dierker is suspended for personal attacks, how much more should
Walsh be.
************
For a better understanding of Mr Walsh's bullying tactics please refer to
this private threat: (note the "us")
"if every post by you to very forum results in a response discrediting your
comments, and ask ourself if you really want to keep this up."
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:39:57 -0800
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Business
Reply-To: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <10236322253.20010324143957@userfriendly.com>
To: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [idno] FW: [wg-review] Representative Figures
In-Reply-To: <PFEEIKEMONOHLLLBKKEBMEJDELAA.dassa@dhs.org>
References: <PFEEIKEMONOHLLLBKKEBMEJDELAA.dassa@dhs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Envelope-To: terastra@terabytz.co.nz
X-UIDL: 7900f9fcca71a1709c51383d87ad38ef
Saturday, March 24, 2001, 2:25:44 PM, Dassa wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Joop Teernstra
> Sent: Saturday, 24 March 2001 11:27 AM
> To: Jefsey Morfin; wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] Representative Figures
> It is also the reason why "independent" lists that convey a certain
> consensus, such as the IDNO-discuss list (once ) and the NCDNHC list are
> infiltrated by professional "neutralizers".
> --Joop--
> Former bootstrap of the CA/idno
> The Polling Booth
> www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I find it interesting that Joop continues to make comments such as above in
> other forums. A certain degree of bitterness may be tolerated but I for
one am
> getting sick of seeing such posts by Joop.
> Joop, fair warning. Stick to the facts regarding the IDNO or expect to be
> corrected. Your continued fallacy that the IDNO was infiltrated by
> "professional disrupters/neutralizers" does not stand up to scrutiny.
I'm sending this offlist.
This kind of thing will cause a breach of my silence, Joop. I don't
think you want posts in response to you everytime you post crap like
this so that the record can be straightened out.
Your comments in Melbourne crossed the line, but I was willing to toss
that off.
But your continuing these types of false and inflammatory comments
will cause the silence about the issues to be reversed.
Consider yourself forewarned.
Balance your desire to try and paint us in as bad a light as you can
(which is just your retaliation for not getting you way) with the
consequences to your continued credibility if every post by you to
every forum results in a response discrediting your comments, and ask
yourself if you really want to keep this up.
--
Best regards,
William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|