ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-abuse]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-abuse] Dispute resolution


Dear Danny

I sent a copy to GA-ABUSE to *force* you to respond to my private
correspondence.  I saw them as a witness.  You did not reply.  You still
haven't replied to ME personally.

Fuck you Danny, you're an arrrogant prick.

Patrick


----- Original Message -----
From: Danny Younger <webmaster@babybows.com>
To: <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 4:03 AM
Subject: [ga-abuse] Dispute resolution


> Fellow members,
>
> I am forwarding to you comments sent to me by our Alternate Chair that are
> indicative of a problem.  This is not a formal complaint, but I do seek
your
> guidance in this matter.   As Patrick has forwarded to this committee his
> "WARNING OF PUBLIC ATTACK", it is clear to my thinking that he considers
the
> membership of this committee to constitute an appropriate forum for
dispute
> resolution.  Although this is not your assigned task, any considered
advice
> would be welcome.
>
> Best regards,
> Danny Younger
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alternate Chair [mailto:patrick@quad.net.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:39 PM
> To: Jefsey Morfin, wanadoo
> Cc: Danny Younger
> Subject: Taking Out the Chair
>
> Hi Jefsey
>
> OK.  Now I agree that Danny is not doing a good job as Chair.  That would
> not matter if he listened-responded to constructive criticism from his
> friends.  But he won't.
>
> I can't believe how politically dumb he is.  So I am changing my approach.
> I will attack him mercilessly whenever I feel like it.  He is the one
person
> I can safely attack.
>
> One problem that you both share is that your messages are too long and
> involved for people to understand.  That will be a theme of mine in
dealing
> with you both.
>
> I am sending a copy to Danny so he understands.
>
> Without being (a) long or (b) rude, please explain what you want.
>
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alternate Chair [mailto:patrick@quad.net.au]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 1:37 PM
> To: Danny Younger
> Subject: Fuck You Danny
>
> Dear Danny
>
> You don't get it, do you?  You don't support me one little bit.  You never
> consult with me.  Elisabeth won't do what she's told to do.  Everybody on
> the list is attacking me.  Half the list is confused about where to post.
> There
> are too many lists and you start another.  We have only got one
half-hearted
> sublist Chair.  You've made no attempt to help me with the *bounces* and
> other list management tasks.  There are no "terms of reference" for the
> individual lists.  And then you attack me publicly !!
>
> The result is that WXW wants to close the lists down.  Which will mean
that
> the the whole GA will fall into a bottomless pit of valueless discussion.
>
> The only way we are ever going to succeed is by working together.  With
both
> of us "working" the lists.  Not just issuing pompous pronouncements which
> are usually not worth reading.
>
> You're lucky I don't post this publicly.  I expect to hear from you within
> 24 hours.  Please re-evaluate your approach.
>
> Patrick
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alternate Chair [mailto:patrick@quad.net.au]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 3:46 AM
> To: Danny Younger
> Cc: [ga-abuse]; Elisabeth Porteneuve
> Subject: WARNING OF PUBLIC ATTACK
>
> Hi Danny
>
> Can you advise me what the procedures are for setting up new mailing
lists,
> please.  I have been very careful not to criticise you in public but I am
> rather annoyed that a new mailing list was set up without any
consultation.
> Did you instruct Elisabeth Porteneuve to do this?
>
> What is the point of setting up new sublists if you, our Chair, won't use
> them yourself?  More to the point, why do you not communicate with your
own
> Alternative Chair.
>
> How is it that you get Elisabeth to do what you want when I have been
asking
> for weeks to eliminate the returned mail and other junk.  Does Elisabeth
get
> a copy of the two hundred returned emails I get a day because Roeland
Meyer
> has problems with his servers?  Do you get them?
>
> As I do not get any response from you in private I will wait a few days
> until you are settled in after Stockholm and then attack you in public.
> Meanwhile:
>
> PLEASE DON"T YOU OR ELISABETH DO STUFF WITHOUT TALKING TO ME FIRST.
>
> I'm fed up with your "big chief" attitude, believe me.
>
> Regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
>
>
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>