Re: [ga-abuse] Agreement on Procedures

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@Alvestrand.no>]

At 11:13 25.04.2001 +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
>Sorry I phrased it badly.  Just an incorrect way of thinking.  I am
>subscribed to [ga-full]  and assume that a person might be subscribed to
>[ga] when they get suspended.
>
>Without quite understanding how these two lists are related, the suspended
>person can then post mail which is distributed to everone on [ga-full] but
>not those on[ga].  Thus they are invisible as far as the normal mailing list
>is concerned.
>
>However, as the are not posting to [ga] they can say what they like.

Right. I'd like to change that - but it requires a rules change, which 
requires a vote.

>I agree with you other comments (yes, we need a secretary) and would like to
>see what people's views are.  If we need to handle complaints urgently, five
>people is a bit hard to manage.