RE: [ga-abuse] Agreement on Procedures

[R.Gaetano@iaea.org]

Hi.
I fail to see how we can change that, as anybody, even non-subscribers, can
post to GA-full sending a message to ga@dnso.org.
This was not by rule, but by design.
Roberto

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@Alvestrand.no]
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2001 13:17
> To: Patrick Corliss
> Cc: [ga-abuse]
> Subject: Re: [ga-abuse] Agreement on Procedures
> 
> 
> At 11:13 25.04.2001 +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> >Sorry I phrased it badly.  Just an incorrect way of thinking.  I am
> >subscribed to [ga-full]  and assume that a person might be 
> subscribed to
> >[ga] when they get suspended.
> >
> >Without quite understanding how these two lists are related, 
> the suspended
> >person can then post mail which is distributed to everone on 
> [ga-full] but
> >not those on[ga].  Thus they are invisible as far as the 
> normal mailing list
> >is concerned.
> >
> >However, as the are not posting to [ga] they can say what they like.
> 
> Right. I'd like to change that - but it requires a rules 
> change, which 
> requires a vote.
> 
> >I agree with you other comments (yes, we need a secretary) 
> and would like to
> >see what people's views are.  If we need to handle 
> complaints urgently, five
> >people is a bit hard to manage.
>