Fw: [ga-abuse] Re: [ga] Abuse

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

Hi Danny & Elisabeth

Can we implement a cross-posting constraint against posting on both [ga] and
[ga-abuse]?  It would be apprecoated.  These are just insults - not valid
complaints.

Best regards
Patrick


----- Original Message -----
From: William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
To: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
Cc: babybows.com <webmaster@babybows.com>; [ga-abuse] <ga-abuse@dnso.org>;
<ga@dnso.org>; Patrick Corliss <patrick@quad.net.au>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 7:12 PM
Subject: [ga-abuse] Re: [ga] Abuse


> Hello Eric,
>
> Tuesday, April 24, 2001, 11:53:27 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Here is the Alt Chair in his finest clothery.  "Big never good"  Is the
> > GA caput, over and finished.  If so who stands for us dotcommoners?
> > Man, in twenty four hours I see no care but bystanders and ambulances.
>
> See a pattern here?
>
> Criticize one of these two, and they will go looking for a reason to
> punish you.
>
> The GA will not be able to be legitimate while they continue on this
> type of a censorship campaign.
>
> Patrick: Sotiris was being nice.  Had it been me, I would have
> included you in the "vindictive nature and predisposition"
> characterization.
>
> It is most appropriate, after all, and reflects your behaviors.
>
> Silencing your critics with banishment doesn't help you any.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com
>
>