ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-budget]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-budget] RE: FIRST PROPOSAL FOR A DNSO BUDGET FOR 2002


Roger,

Agree with Peter on webcasting issue, and would add
translation services as an item that the constituencies
should not be burdened with. As more countries become
involved in the ICANN proceedings, the requirement for
multi-language translations could escalate into a budget
nightmare.

Regards

Tony Harris
----- Mensaje original -----
De: "peter de blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>
Para: "'Cochetti, Roger'" <RCochetti@verisign.com>; "'Gomes, Chuck'"
<cgomes@verisign.com>; "'"Vany" Martinze'" <ceo@vany.org>; "'Anthony
Harris'" <harris@cabase.org.ar>; "'Elisabeth Porteneuve'"
<Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>; "'Erica Roberts'"
<erica.roberts@bigpond.com>; "'Ken Stubbs'" <kstubbs@digitel.net>; "'Ken
Stubbs'" <kstubbs@corenic.org>; "'Marilyn Cade'" <mcade@att.com>; "'Philip
Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>; "'vany Martinze'" <Vany@sdnp.org.pa>
CC: "'Nc-Budget (E-mail)'" <nc-budget@dnso.org>
Enviado: Domingo 2 de Diciembre de 2001 20:39
Asunto: [nc-budget] RE: FIRST PROPOSAL FOR A DNSO BUDGET FOR 2002


> I agree with all of this except webcasting.
>
> ICANN should put the webcasting in its own budget, as it "justifies" the
> "global outreach" and lends credibility to the overall process.
>
> The constituencies should not be burdened with the cost of webcasting.
> Frankly, there have been so few persons participating via webcast that
> it would have been less expensive to just fly them to the ICANN
> meetings.
>
> Peter de Blanc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cochetti, Roger [mailto:RCochetti@verisign.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:40 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; '"Vany" Martinze'; 'Anthony Harris'; 'Elisabeth
> Porteneuve'; 'Erica Roberts'; 'Ken Stubbs'; 'Ken Stubbs'; 'Marilyn
> Cade'; 'Peter deBlanc'; 'Philip Sheppard'; 'vany Martinze'
> Cc: 'Nc-Budget (E-mail)'
> Subject: FIRST PROPOSAL FOR A DNSO BUDGET FOR 2002
>
>
> Her is a discussion draft of a 2002 DNSO Budget.  Glen assisted me in
> its development and it begins with a brief projection of the funds we
> are likely to carry over from 2001 into 2002.
>
> Roger Cochetti
> Chair
> Names Council Budget Committee
>
> =======================================================================
>
>
> Current funds $173K
>
> Rough Commitments Against Current Funds Through EOY 2001
>
> AFNIC '00   $59K
> AFNIC  '01  $40K
> G S G        $ 7K
> Other          $4K
> TOTAL        $110K
>
> Projected surplus of Funds at Year-End 2001 $63K
>
> =======================================================================
>
> PROJECTED DNSO EXPENSES IN 2002:  MINIMUM
>
> Secretariat (including AFNIC) $60K
>
> Connectivity $10 K
>
> Telephone $ 5K
>
> Secretariat Travel $15K
>
> Misc $30K
>
>
> TOTAL $120K
>
> LESS 2001 CARRYOVER -$63K
>
> ADDITIONAL FUNDS NEEDED $57K
>
> PER CONSTITUENCY (7) $8.2K
>
>
> POTENTIAL ADDED EXPENSES
>
> Partial Staff Support $50K
> ($7.2K/Constituency)
>
> Web casting $50K ( "
> " )
>
> Translation Services $50K  (
> " "
> )
>
> Full Staff Support $120K
> ($17.1K/Constituency)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Roger J. Cochetti
> Senior Vice President & Chief Policy Officer
> VeriSign
> rcochetti@verisign.com
> 202-973-6600
>
> >
> >
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>