ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-budget]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-budget] A call


Seems to me that the subgroup, lead by Erica was made from Erica, myself,
>Elisabeth and Peter De Blanc.
>Did I miss someone?

Yep - you missed someone. Chuck Gomes is standing in for Roger and has done a 
lot of work in progressing the issue.  He has also very kindly volunteered to 
host the teleconf.  I don't believe we can afford to loose him!

erica

>===== Original Message From Dany Vandromme <vandrome@renater.fr> =====
>On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, erica.roberts wrote:
>
>> We seem to be loosing a thread here - I had proposed a teleconf of the nc
>> budget sub-committee to finalise the proposals for the search process,
>> selection criteria and selection process for consideration by the nc budget
>> committee.  However, it is unclear who is on the nc buddget subcommittee 
and
>> it seems that the call has been put out for a meeting of the entire nc 
budget
>> committee.  This is not necessarily a bad thing - but we need to be clear
>> about what we're doing.
>-
>Seems to me that the subgroup, lead by Erica was made from Erica, myself,
>Elisabeth and Peter De Blanc.
>Did I miss someone?
>-
>>
>> The sub-committee was tasked with formulating proposals for (i) the search
>> process, (ii) the selection criteria and (iii) the selection process.  I 
have
>> put out a draft proposal on the selection criteria and selection process 
(see
>> attached).  Chuck has volunteered to draft a proposal on the search process
>> but this has not yet been put out for comment.  The sub-committee was not
>> tasked with refining the job description - this is a matter for the full nc
>> budget committee.
>-
>Agree with Erica
>-
>>
>> If the meeting on Fri is to be of the full nc budget committee, who is to
>> chair - Roger?  Is the agenda to include the job description?
>-
>As I told before, I have already a teleconf for the NCC adcom at the same
>time. I cannot attend both.
>I would prefer to see the nc-budget planned wit more formalism than just
>as derivation of that specific subgroup made of 3 or 4 individuals.
>-
>>
>> erica
>>
>> >===== Original Message From "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com> =====
>> >ok by me
>> >
>> >ken
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
>> >To: <nc-budget@dnso.org>
>> >Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:44 AM
>> >Subject: Re: [nc-budget] A call
>> >
>> >
>> >> A call this Friday September 29 at 8am EST is fine by me.
>> >> Philip
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER
>
>                Reseau National de Telecommunications
>         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
>
>                                  |  ENSAM
>Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
>Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
>E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
>--------------------------------------------------------------------





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>