ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-budget]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-budget] A call


my fault  i was just "trying to stay invloved"  i am not on that
subcommittee so i will not be on the call this week

ken
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dany Vandromme" <vandrome@renater.fr>
To: "erica.roberts" <erica.roberts@telstra.com>
Cc: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com>; <nc-budget@dnso.org>; "Philip
Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: [nc-budget] A call


> On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, erica.roberts wrote:
>
> > We seem to be loosing a thread here - I had proposed a teleconf of the
nc
> > budget sub-committee to finalise the proposals for the search process,
> > selection criteria and selection process for consideration by the nc
budget
> > committee.  However, it is unclear who is on the nc buddget subcommittee
and
> > it seems that the call has been put out for a meeting of the entire nc
budget
> > committee.  This is not necessarily a bad thing - but we need to be
clear
> > about what we're doing.
> -
> Seems to me that the subgroup, lead by Erica was made from Erica, myself,
> Elisabeth and Peter De Blanc.
> Did I miss someone?
> -
> >
> > The sub-committee was tasked with formulating proposals for (i) the
search
> > process, (ii) the selection criteria and (iii) the selection process.  I
have
> > put out a draft proposal on the selection criteria and selection process
(see
> > attached).  Chuck has volunteered to draft a proposal on the search
process
> > but this has not yet been put out for comment.  The sub-committee was
not
> > tasked with refining the job description - this is a matter for the full
nc
> > budget committee.
> -
> Agree with Erica
> -
> >
> > If the meeting on Fri is to be of the full nc budget committee, who is
to
> > chair - Roger?  Is the agenda to include the job description?
> -
> As I told before, I have already a teleconf for the NCC adcom at the same
> time. I cannot attend both.
> I would prefer to see the nc-budget planned wit more formalism than just
> as derivation of that specific subgroup made of 3 or 4 individuals.
> -
> >
> > erica
> >
> > >===== Original Message From "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com> =====
> > >ok by me
> > >
> > >ken
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
> > >To: <nc-budget@dnso.org>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:44 AM
> > >Subject: Re: [nc-budget] A call
> > >
> > >
> > >> A call this Friday September 29 at 8am EST is fine by me.
> > >> Philip
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER
>
>                 Reseau National de Telecommunications
>          pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
>
>                                   |  ENSAM
> Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
> Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
> E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>