Re: [ga-roots] [Fwd: Fwd: nos voro illos que offendo]

["NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

Well, someone believes in them. ipv4.com, ipv6.com, ipv8.com, and ipv16.com
are all taken.

For ipv16.com
 UNIR CORPORATION (IPV15-DOM)
   One Naperville Plaza
   NAPERVILLE, IL 60563
   US

For ipv8.com
Silvano Gai (IPV8-DOM)
   3021 Mauna Loa Ct
   San Jose, CA 95132-2303
   US



Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
To: "NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>
Cc: "[ga-roots]" <ga-roots@dnso.org>; "Jim Fleming, PRODIGY"
<JimFleming@prodigy.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: [ga-roots] [Fwd: Fwd: nos voro illos que offendo]


> Hi Chris
>
> As has been said the current standard is IPv4 which every knows as a
normal
> IP address such as 100.23.201.66.  Because it has 4 parts it is known as a
> "quad".  By coincidence I use the word "quad" as the name of my company
and
> my email address.  The dots in between cause it to be called a "dotted
> quad".  IPv6 is the new standard with a greatly increased address space.
> Certainly it will overcome any forseeable problems.
>
> A search of google.com gives a mass of information eg http://www.ipv6.org/
>
> Jim Fleming is considered very brilliant.  His style is so unorthodox that
> he has trouble communicating with ordinary people.  Some people on the
list
> know him quite well.  Personally I like the guy.  He recently subscribed
to
> GA-ROOTS and posted in his usual cryptic style.  This raised a whole swag
of
> mixed feelings.  Most are saying his IPv8 and IPv16 systems are imaginary
or
> worse.  However, Jim should not be underestimated and it may well be that
> his proposals will become an established standard in years to come.
>
> Meanwhile the best that can be said is that he is ahead of his time.  Most
> people on the list (including me, I might say) have no idea what he is
> talking about.  If I had ample funds I would take a chance and hire a team
> to make sense out of his proposals.  I'm sure it would be worthwhile.
>
> I keep promising myself one day to take time to see what I can work out.
> However, I see it as a difficult task and, with so many other things to
do,
> one that it is easy to procrastinate over.
>
> Perhaps others have a better idea of the echnical merits.
>
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: NameCritic <watch-dog@inreach.com>
> To: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
> Cc: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [ga-roots] [Fwd: Fwd: nos voro illos que offendo]
>
>
> > For dummies like me and anyone who might be lurking here. What is an IPV
> 1,
> > 2, 3, 6, 8 or otherwise. One of the reasons for the lack of
participation
> on
> > lists is the use of acronyms and technical terms. We want more
> participation
> > then we will have to stop doing that and include some lay terms for
things
> > including limiting the number of acronyms used.
> >
> > Or publish the GA Dictionary.
> >
> > Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Eric Dierker" <eric@hi-tek.com>
> > To: "Kristy McKee" <k@widgital.com>
> > Cc: <>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ga-roots] [Fwd: Fwd: nos voro illos que offendo]
> >
> >
> > > Would one of you later day genius' explain the ramifications to us
> plebes.
> > The
> > > way I read it sounds great, like even if someone really messes up
> someone
> > else
> > > can come and clean it up. (hell, after Walsh's comments today I am
still
> > trying
> > > to prove the existance of an IPV6 - I know 8s exist and that APNIC
wants
> > to
> > > charge extra for 6s and that folks using the different methods
actually
> > are
> > > faster in resolution)
> > >
> > > Insincerely,
> > >
> > > Kristy McKee wrote:
> > >
> > > > So,
> > > >
> > > > should we stick our heads in the sand and let a group of folks we do
> not
> > > > know and certainly do not trust make the decisions for us or should
we
> > open
> > > > a communication forum to enable a pure collaborative structure to
> begin
> > > > development?
> > > >
> > > > ~k
>
>
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html