RE: [ga-abuse] Kent Crispin is being continually obnoxious

[R.Gaetano@iaea.org]

Dear monitors,

My general attitude would be in a tie not to enforce sanctions, whoever is
the sanctioned member.
The rationale for this is that if we apply the reverse rule one list monitor
could force sanctions whatever the other list monitor's opinion would be,
and this is, IMHO, highly dangerous.
If a third person should break the tie, I would propose the Alternate Chair,
in order to leave to the Chair the privilege of the final say.
Moreover, I recommend to recruit more monitors: if I remember correctly, a
call for candidatures has been made by the Chair, and two people answered
positively.

Regards
Roberto


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Svensson [mailto:svensson@icannchannel.de]
> Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 16:05
> To: ga-abuse@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga-abuse] Kent Crispin is being continually obnoxious
> 
> 
> 
> Leah Gallegos wrote:
> > Why is it that Kent gets away with contantly
> > insulting those who disagree with him in
> > principle and others are immediately sanctioned
> > or suspended.  The above is but one example of
> > his obnoxious and insulting posts.
> 
> I note that Joop's and Leah's complaints about
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg00497.html
> are the first complaints we have received about Kent
> Crispin since taking over from Harald.
> 
> I would very much like to hear from our Chair or
> Alt.Chair how we shall proceed -- or from anyone
> else, for that matter. Tossing a coin (or using
> http://shazam.econ.ubc.ca/flip/) seems rather
> unsatisfactory...
> 
> Best regards,
> /// Alexander
>