ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-abuse]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-abuse] [Admin] M1 for Complaint Against Patrick Corliss


At 07:37 PM 7/25/2001 +0200, Alexander Svensson wrote:
> > Date: 7/19
> > Complainant:  William Walsh, william@userfriendly.com
> > Complaint:  "I ask that a warning be issued to Patrick for violating the
> > rules of the DNSO mailing list that the posts be relevant to the 
> business of
> > the GA.  The first one on the subject of spam is forgivable, but
> > to continue it in this fashion is not.
> >
> > There is no way anyone can stretch "spam" or valid commercial email
> > (which I believe this case to be) as being something that is relevant
> > to the business of the GA."
> >
> > Against:  Patrick Corliss, patrick@quad.net.au
> > Message:  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc07/msg03852.html
> > Injury:  broken rule - posts must be relevant to the business of the GA.
> > Injured:  DNSO GA
> >
> > M1:  Kristy McKee
> > Comment:  SPAM may be relevant to our discussions; but probably not in the
> > format referenced above.
> > Action:  ignore
>
>M2: Alexander Svensson
>Comment: In my opinion, that mail is on the very edge of
>being relevant. I agree to ignore the complaint since the
>overall behaviour of ICANN-accredited registrars is
>important for the DNSO (and hence the GA), but the list
>of accredited registrars is long enough that discussion
>of their bad mail practices would drown every meaningful
>discussion...
>Action: Ignore
>
> > -------------------------
> > please note:  Alexander is having a few day break from all of us,
>  *grin*
> > so this will  not achieve resolution prior to Monday.


Agreed.

:)

~k



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>