ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-abuse]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-abuse] [Admin] M1 for Complaint Against Patrick Corliss


> Date: 7/19
> Complainant:  William Walsh, william@userfriendly.com
> Complaint:  "I ask that a warning be issued to Patrick for violating the
> rules of the DNSO mailing list that the posts be relevant to the business of
> the GA.  The first one on the subject of spam is forgivable, but
> to continue it in this fashion is not.
>
> There is no way anyone can stretch "spam" or valid commercial email
> (which I believe this case to be) as being something that is relevant
> to the business of the GA."
>
> Against:  Patrick Corliss, patrick@quad.net.au
> Message:  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc07/msg03852.html
> Injury:  broken rule - posts must be relevant to the business of the GA.
> Injured:  DNSO GA
>
> M1:  Kristy McKee
> Comment:  SPAM may be relevant to our discussions; but probably not in the
> format referenced above.
> Action:  ignore

M2: Alexander Svensson
Comment: In my opinion, that mail is on the very edge of
being relevant. I agree to ignore the complaint since the
overall behaviour of ICANN-accredited registrars is
important for the DNSO (and hence the GA), but the list
of accredited registrars is long enough that discussion
of their bad mail practices would drown every meaningful
discussion...
Action: Ignore

> -------------------------
> please note:  Alexander is having a few day break from all of us,
 *grin*
> so this will  not achieve resolution prior to Monday.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>