<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga-abuse] Re: [ga] Motion to the Chair
> Jim Fleming was officially warned, and the next time he will be suspended.
> That raises an interesting point: should the GA be aware of the official
> warnings?
I wonder whether it makes sense to post the
completed warnings and suspensions in some form
to GA-rules on a regular basis, together with
an explanation how a complaint can be made.
Best regards,
/// Alexander
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@does-not-exist.org]
>> Sent: Monday, 09 July 2001 11:53
>> To: Patrick Corliss
>> Cc: Danny Younger; ga-abuse@dnso.org
>> Subject: [ga-abuse] Re: [ga] Motion to the Chair
>>
>>
>> Patrick Corliss to Danny Younger:
>>
>> >Why don't you just complaint to [ga-abuse] like everybody else? Or
>> >even set a good example by posting to the [ga-rules] mailing list?
>>
>> How efficient would this be? I complained about (I think) three of
>> the offenders which were mentioned.
>>
>> The only complaint which lead to anything was the one against Eric
>> Dierker (which was later on lifted by you). It doesn't seem that my
>> complaints about Jim Fleming and Jeff Williams (who considerably
>> contribute to the noise on ga) lead to anything.
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
>>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|