ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-abuse]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-abuse] Request for Footer on GA-ABUSE Mailing List




All,

My text is not quoted completely, and the people added in reply
CC may miss the substance.
I am very sorry to add to your e-mail work.

-----------
==> I add another subject for all List Monitors and consideration:
    about non cross-posting of ga-abuse with others lists.

    I would not like to see the slitest accusation of Secretariat
    about filtering and censorship.

    The purpose of ga-abuse is to complain. Such complain MUST
    be allowed to any member of the DNSO (it is - the posting to
    ga-abuse is allowed to any subscriber to any DNSO list).
    Usually complains arrive only to ga-abuse - as Harald mention, 
    there was almost no cross-posting during last 3 months
    (forward from a list is not cross-posting in the technical
    meaning).

    Now, if the Lists Monitors consider that the ga-abuse should
    be non cross-posted (technical meaning of non cross-posting)
    with other GA lists, I would be grateful you decide it formaly 
    and announce this formal decision to the DNSO.
    Then the Secretariat will set up filters.

    Regards,
    Elisabeth Porteneuve
-----------

Elisabeth Porteneuve


| From patrick@quad.net.au Fri Jul  6 13:50 MET 2001
| From: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
| To: "DNSO Secretariat" <DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org>
| Cc: "M. Stuart Lynn, ICANN" <lynn@icann.org>, "[ga-abuse]" <ga-abuse@dnso.org>,
|         "Names Council" <council@dnso.org>
| Subject: [ga-abuse] Request for Footer on GA-ABUSE Mailing List
| Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 21:56:03 +1000

<snip>

| 
| 
| > ==> I add another subject for all List Monitors and consideration:
| >     about non cross-posting of ga-abuse with others lists.
| 
| I'll deal with each issue separately if I may.  I will note, for the record,
| that you remain opposed to that request also.
| 
| My simple request to add some form of list footer was deliberately chosen to
| gauge the extent of your co-operation.  If you like, it was a test.
| Personally I find it most onerous to have such protracted debates over such
| simple requests.
| 
| For the record, can you advise whether or not you will add a footer?
| 
| Best regards
| Patrick Corliss
| 
| 
| 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>