[ga-abuse] Fwd: Re: Re[6]: A point of agreement (Re: [ga-roots] response to response to response)

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

I just want to note for the record that my post was sent to him
privately, and did not appear on any list until he posted it.

Since that post contained what was, admittedly, a personal attack, and
prior rulings by the previous chair indicated that a reposter assumed
responsibility for the content of posts they repost to the list under
the GA rules, I ask that this second incident be taken into
consideration when deciding how to act on the original personal
attack by this person.

Consider this a second complaint incident.

This is a forwarded message
From: NameCritic <watch-dog@inreach.com>
To: William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2001, 3:46:58 AM
Subject: A point of agreement (Re: [ga-roots] response to response to  response)

===8<==============Original message text===============
My posts speak for themselves. Don't withdraw anything you feel a need to
do. I don't care who you are under contract with. Your posts reflect a
disruptive tendency to every discussion posted. When I disgree with ICANN
being the main root you feel somehow personally attacked. makes me believe
after reading any of your posts that you have taken sides on the issues. Now
you say you ride the fence and are not taking sides. Make up your mind. I do
not retract the statements I made and don't have any plans to do so. Anyone
reading this list can see the whole truth in the matter. The post below was
in response to your previous post. Maybe they will ban us both. I'll
consider that a compromise so that others might actually get something done
without your disruptions.



Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:38 AM
Subject: Re[6]: A point of agreement (Re: [ga-roots] response to response to
response)


> Hello NameCritic,
>
> Tuesday, May 29, 2001, 3:25:05 AM, NameCritic wrote:
>
> > You need a much thicker skin. None of my public post berated you in any
way.
>
> > But have it your way. You are only here to disrupt the list anyway as
most
> > puppets do. They get you any new strings lately?
>
> BTw, Chris, better start learning some facts before you engage in
> baseless personal attacks when you can't answer other's arguments
> refuting your position.
>
> The fact of the matter is that I am under contract to one of the
> alt.roots.
>
> That you accuse me of being a disrupter "puppet" of someone is rather
> amusing, and only illustrates your complete and utter ignorance of any
> of the history or of the people involved.
>
> I've made a complaint to the ga-abuse moderators about your personal
> attack on list.
>
> I'll expect an onlist apology, in which case I'll withdraw it.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh
> mailto:william@userfriendly.com
> Owner, Userfriendly.com
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
>
>

===8<===========End of original message text===========



-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh
mailto:william@userfriendly.com
Owner, Userfriendly.com
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net