[ga-abuse] Fwd: Re: Re[4]: A point of agreement (Re: [ga-roots] response to response to response)

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Personal attack

This is a forwarded message
From: NameCritic <watch-dog@inreach.com>
To: William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2001, 3:25:05 AM
Subject: A point of agreement (Re: [ga-roots] response to response to  response)

===8<==============Original message text===============
You need a much thicker skin. None of my public post berated you in any way.

But have it your way. You are only here to disrupt the list anyway as most
puppets do. They get you any new strings lately?

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>
Cc: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:57 AM
Subject: Re[4]: A point of agreement (Re: [ga-roots] response to response to
response)


> Hello NameCritic,
>
> Tuesday, May 29, 2001, 2:50:33 AM, NameCritic wrote:
>
> > There is no THE current process William. You sound brainwashed here.
There
> > will ALWAYS be alternatives to the ICANN Root and some of those
alternatives
> > are viable and some will eventually have more users than the ICANN Root.
>
> You say that as if it is fact.
>
> I seriously doubt it will EVER be fact, based on prior performance,
> and the fact that none of the alt.roots seem to be willing or able to
> do what it takes to be commercially viable entities.
>
> > I personally know of some existing software that can deliver websites
via
> > voice recogniton right now. If this software is given to users for free
and
> > it points them to another root instead of ICANN's then what you know as
the
> > main root is in huge trouble.
>
> Don't count on it, Chris.  If I had a $1 for every "killer app" idea
> I've heard from the alt.root community, which never materializes, I'd
> be able to afford that trip take recently by a man named Tito.
>
> ICANN has a current process and policy, that does not include any
> expansion of rights from alternative roots to the root that ICANN
> Effectively controls.  This makes ICANN's root a unique root.
>
> Under ICANN's current process, there are no conflicts.
>
> What rights exist to TLD operators in alternative roots/namespaces
> exists ONLY in those roots and namespaces.  It does not extend
> further.
>
> ICANN recognizes this.
>
> BTW, since you indicated that you didn't want to receive private email
> from me, I'm assuming you meant to send your response to the list
> (something you failed to do also the last time you complained about me
> email you privately, but later corrected by reposting the comment to
> the list), so I've CC'd my response there assuming you made the same
> mistake again.
>
> You are free to repost your comment there.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh
> mailto:william@userfriendly.com
> Owner, Userfriendly.com
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

===8<===========End of original message text===========



-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh
mailto:william@userfriendly.com
Owner, Userfriendly.com
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net