Re: Fw: [ga-abuse] Complaint Against Eric Dierker

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

At first look, I have very much plenty to say and it may astound you but it is
all good.  I sit here just finishing up a research project for Vietnam on what
is the best method for privacy protection in their culture and economy and then
I check and get this mail. You may think that it ruins my day, and you could be
right because I very much care about how our GA progresses and my thousands of
hours of work here is severely curtailed when Mr. Corliss gets me banned.  But
you would be wrong if you thought I was anything but overjoyed at your
message.  Your message came and asked for my input on your evaluation of
banning me and that is fantastic!!
That is the single most large leap of due process progress that has ever
occurred in ICANN.

Ladies and Gentlemen we have progressed to a point of no return, we are
approaching openness and transparency.  We are teedering on a balance beam of
oblivion on one side and truly lifesaving openness on the other.  Our first
choice would be to jump quickly into the good side and that would seem good.
But alas this is not our right. You and I and Mr. Corliss must correct our
balance and remain here to fight off that oblivion.  I asked my CEO last night
if I could go back to a point before the WG-Review and work on some contracts
of some sort, and he shook his head and told me that "clearly this hell found
between deception and the etherworld is your destiny"

I live in a world where truth in speech is protected.  Mr. Corliss lied to me
through omission.  When he and Joop asked me to sign onto a dual ticket with he
and Danny he completely omitted the material fact of his inovlement in the
TLDA. This was done personally on a break in meetings in Melbourne. That is a
lie plain and simple.  It was repeated here on this list and in the election
process and pointed out by none other than our chair who has not recanted that
position. THIS WAS NOT AN ATTACK ON A PERSON THIS WAS A RECITAL OF TRUE HISTORY
OF THE GA. It is important history lest it be repeated. It has to do with
capture which is a true and legitmate concern of everyone in ICANN.

Please look at this message;
http://forum.icann.org/cgi-bin/rpgmessage.cgi?newtldagmts;3AE782520000013A
Please check with Andrew on the ICANN staff and think about the monitoring
policy which allows you to censor my words.
Please notice that my complaints against him get some response in ten days
while his against me recieve notice in less than 12 hours. This is called
capture.
If you control the content of this list to this extent then you are liable for
it's content as a publisher and author and editor and you are hereby put on
notice as to libel and slander claims against you and I hereby demand an
immediate retraction of all defamatory remarks against me.  ALL

Take my word for it, you do not want to walk down this road because each of you
editors are becoming liable for each remark on this list.  Believe me the
company which sponsors me is an ISP and we host and we link and we run as far
as we can from controlling content because we cannot and will not get sued
because we edited what someone else published through our site.

With all this said if you would like me to publish a nice retraction of my
comment and keep all of this quiet I would be more than pleased to oblige. If
any on the abuse group are worried about this comment I promise to fix it so as
not to cause deviseveness of insult or injury.

Again, I am tickled pink at this new process of early warning and chance for
comment. "Due Process is the beginning of treating our fellow man with dignity
and therefor creating it in ourselves" (ed 2001)

Best to all who work so hard to ensure the GA survival

Bruce James wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Eric:
>
>     Do you have anything you would like say about the item below?
>
> /Bruce
>
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
> To: "[ga-abuse]" <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
> Sent: May 26, 2001 07:40
> Subject: [ga-abuse] Complaint Against Eric Dierker
>
> Complaint Against Eric Dierker
> Grounds:  Pewrsonal Attack, Insults & Slander
> "you bad ass intellectuals mess with our lives"
> "Corliss lied about his intentions and is glorified"
>
> Regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
> To: babybows.com <webmaster@babybows.com>; Cindy Merry
> <tomerrys@inter-linc.net>; Don Evans <DEvans@doc.gov>; <ga@dnso.org>; icann
> board address <icann-board@icann.org>; Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>;
> Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>; Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
> <froomkin@law.miami.edu>; NameCritic <watch-dog@inreach.com>; Patrick
> Corliss <patrick@quad.net.au>; Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@aim.be>;
> Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>; Roberto GA <ga_list@hotmail.com>; sotiris
> <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>; Sotiris <mnemotechny@yahoo.ca>;
> <wg-review@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 3:29 PM
> Subject: [ga] finally we have a direct connection
>
> > There is a direct link between the control against the real dotBIZ the
> > attempted manipulation of ccTLDs and our rights as dotcommoners. Look
> > here real close ladies and gents when I speak of dotcommoners I do not
> > speak of my whitebread so. cal. kids, I speak of shoe shine boys (20s
> > supporting families in So.E. Asia) I speak of soon to be AFNIC supported
> > hawkers in the SubSahara.  I speak of my 80 and 90 plus parents. (yea
> > even I was born and adopted). Goodness I speak of doctors who saved my
> > son's life and children who need help in the Sudan.
> >
> > Call me noise! I am sick of the reference to noise!  This is The DNSO
> > and it is the GA.  You smarter than thou folks just jump back or get
> > slammed. Brett and Froomkin you insult us when you refer to our noise!
> > Can't you just for one second back up us ignoramants?  I know most of us
> > are stupid and ignorant of this ether world but come on, who do you
> > represent if we were gone?  We write our mother and we await word from
> > our college students away from home and you bad ass intellectuals mess
> > with our lives and make us worry about collisions.
> > There are thousand and thousands of small businesses throughout the worl
> > that feed their families based on ecommerce and you guys bounce around
> > armagedon like it was part of your business.
> >
> > Joanna's hard work on the "privacy for me campaign" has met with not
> > real support. And we worry some more.  Mr. Morfin seemed to care but was
> > hammered.  Mr Williams had some Ideas and was exciled. Corliss lied
> > about his intentions and is glorified.  I sure hope that the silent
> > majority soon speaks up.
> >
> > dotBIZ has us worried sick.  The APNIC contract is cause for insecurity
> > and I do not addrees the others.
> >
> > Damnit you people don't you realize that the people making this work
> > could not bare to see the reality of your decision makers' facade.  If
> > ISPs told their clients just how bad it was they would all go back to
> > printed media.
> >
> > I am declaring a call to harms.  After the NetSol debacle let them
> > worry.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> >
> > maybe nelodramatic but you tecnointellectuals better start loving the
> > users!!!
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8
>
> iQA/AwUBOw+nBotDk+p459CQEQKyVgCg7VD4vAGv/eDsrHacBzsG2pjYEdMAn0pn
> V3Zay71JMZkkSJ23kTbbVMCx
> =32JL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----