Re: [ga-abuse] Complaint Against Eric Dierker

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

Hi Bruce

I think we agreed that it was reasonable to ask the person against whom a
complaint is being made if they have anything they would like to say about
their post.

In this case I have no objection to you releasing my name as the
complainant.  However, there have been many occasions when the complainant
has not been the person insulted and where they might expect their identity
to be kept confidential.

It would be better if the list monitors simply forward a copy of the
offending post without revealing details of the complainant.  I'd suggest a
message along the following lines:

The List Monitors have received a complaint in respect of your recent
posting alleging that it breaches the General Assembly list rules as
described on the DNSO website at
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-ga-rules-v0.4.html

Before considering this complaint we would ask whether you wish to make any
comment about the allegedly offending posting (shown below).

Does anybody mind if we adopt this procedure in future complaints?

Best regards
Patrick Corliss


----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce James <bmj@keyname.net>
To: Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>
Cc: Abuse-GA <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 10:52 PM
Subject: Fw: [ga-abuse] Complaint Against Eric Dierker


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Eric:
>
>     Do you have anything you would like say about the item below?
>
> /Bruce
>
>
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
> To: "[ga-abuse]" <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
> Sent: May 26, 2001 07:40
> Subject: [ga-abuse] Complaint Against Eric Dierker
>
>
> Complaint Against Eric Dierker
> Grounds:  Pewrsonal Attack, Insults & Slander
> "you bad ass intellectuals mess with our lives"
> "Corliss lied about his intentions and is glorified"
>
> Regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
>
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
> To: babybows.com <webmaster@babybows.com>; Cindy Merry
> <tomerrys@inter-linc.net>; Don Evans <DEvans@doc.gov>; <ga@dnso.org>;
icann
> board address <icann-board@icann.org>; Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>;
> Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>; Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
> <froomkin@law.miami.edu>; NameCritic <watch-dog@inreach.com>; Patrick
> Corliss <patrick@quad.net.au>; Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@aim.be>;
> Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>; Roberto GA <ga_list@hotmail.com>; sotiris
> <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>; Sotiris <mnemotechny@yahoo.ca>;
> <wg-review@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 3:29 PM
> Subject: [ga] finally we have a direct connection
>
>
> > There is a direct link between the control against the real dotBIZ the
> > attempted manipulation of ccTLDs and our rights as dotcommoners. Look
> > here real close ladies and gents when I speak of dotcommoners I do not
> > speak of my whitebread so. cal. kids, I speak of shoe shine boys (20s
> > supporting families in So.E. Asia) I speak of soon to be AFNIC supported
> > hawkers in the SubSahara.  I speak of my 80 and 90 plus parents. (yea
> > even I was born and adopted). Goodness I speak of doctors who saved my
> > son's life and children who need help in the Sudan.
> >
> > Call me noise! I am sick of the reference to noise!  This is The DNSO
> > and it is the GA.  You smarter than thou folks just jump back or get
> > slammed. Brett and Froomkin you insult us when you refer to our noise!
> > Can't you just for one second back up us ignoramants?  I know most of us
> > are stupid and ignorant of this ether world but come on, who do you
> > represent if we were gone?  We write our mother and we await word from
> > our college students away from home and you bad ass intellectuals mess
> > with our lives and make us worry about collisions.
> > There are thousand and thousands of small businesses throughout the worl
> > that feed their families based on ecommerce and you guys bounce around
> > armagedon like it was part of your business.
> >
> > Joanna's hard work on the "privacy for me campaign" has met with not
> > real support. And we worry some more.  Mr. Morfin seemed to care but was
> > hammered.  Mr Williams had some Ideas and was exciled. Corliss lied
> > about his intentions and is glorified.  I sure hope that the silent
> > majority soon speaks up.
> >
> > dotBIZ has us worried sick.  The APNIC contract is cause for insecurity
> > and I do not addrees the others.
> >
> > Damnit you people don't you realize that the people making this work
> > could not bare to see the reality of your decision makers' facade.  If
> > ISPs told their clients just how bad it was they would all go back to
> > printed media.
> >
> > I am declaring a call to harms.  After the NetSol debacle let them
> > worry.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> >
> > maybe nelodramatic but you tecnointellectuals better start loving the
> > users!!!
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8
>
> iQA/AwUBOw+nBotDk+p459CQEQKyVgCg7VD4vAGv/eDsrHacBzsG2pjYEdMAn0pn
> V3Zay71JMZkkSJ23kTbbVMCx
> =32JL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>