[ga-abuse] Joop Ternstra - Complaint Against William X. Walsh

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@corliss.net>]

Hi Joop

> Now Roeland has apologized for his offending Joe Kelsey, Joe Kelsey should
> be asked to apologize for his "anarchist buddies" posting.
> I , for one, felt deeply offended.

Joe Kelsey has since apologised back.  Please advise if this is a complaint
against Joe Kelsey.  I would prefer that you treat EACH complaint
separately, please..

> I am also protesting against  William X. Walsh abusing the list to use
> innuendo and ad-hominem arguments, ascribing unproven motives , making
> unproven false accusations and (worst of all) threatening  to continue
this
> in any further discussions about the IDNO.
>
> The list moderators should insist that all further discussion of the IDNO
> is purely factual, both on the GA and the GA-ext lists.
> This is the ONLY way to progress fairly and get to the truth.

Thank you for your email.  The List Monitors have a large number of
complaints to deal with.  The process is plain and simple.  A complainant
makes a complaint that a particular posting breached a particular rule.  The
Committee then examines that posting to see if it breached the rule.

It is not the role of [ga-abuse] to manage the debate but to deal with
complaints about a specific post which breaches a specific rule.  I note you
have done exactly that with your latest complaint about Mr Walsh.

Could I ask that you review those postings that you see as personal attacks,
insults and slander and send in a separate complaint for each one in the
following form:

    Complaints Against William X. Walsh
    Grounds:    Persnal Attack, Insult and Slander
    http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc07/msg01630.html
    "I'll stick my neck out here, because in this case Joop, you
    are flat out lying."

That will really allow us to focus on what your complaint is exactly.

Best regards
Alternate Chair