ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-abuse]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga-abuse] Fw: [ga] MOTION: Request for a GA resolution on an IDN holders' constituency (IC)


Hi Bruce

I see that as a worthwhile exercise.  What do you think ?

BTW I didn't get round to replying to his email asking for clarification but
he knew the 24 hours were running !!

Regards
Patrick Corliss

----- Original Message -----
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: 'Joe Kelsey' <joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 2:58 AM
Subject: RE: [ga] MOTION: Request for a GA resolution on an IDN holders'
constituency (IC)


> Joe, I apologize for the following message, that I sent to you in the
public
> forum. It got my pique, but I should have sent it in private. Please chalk
> it up to excessive Reply-All usage.
>
> I also apologize to the list for this error. It is a good example of the
> very behavior I am against myself. This message does not forward the best
GA
> list behavior or decorum. There is no defense, I simply apologize. Such
> public behavior is unseemly.
>
> --
> ROELAND M.J. MEYER
> Managing Director
> Morgan Hill Software Company, Inc.
> TEL: +001 925 373 3954
> FAX: +001 925 373 9781
> http://www.mhsc.com
> mailto: rmeyer@mhsc.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roeland Meyer [mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:40 PM
> > To: 'Joe Kelsey'; ga@dnso.org
> > Subject: RE: [ga] MOTION: Request for a GA resolution on an
> > IDN holders'
> > constituency (IC)
> >
> >
> > > From: Joe Kelsey [mailto:joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 3:34 PM
> > >
> > > Joop Teernstra writes:
> > >  > On 15:50 7/05/01 -0700, Joe Kelsey said:
> > >  > >I am opposed to any Individual's Constituency which has
> > > anything at all
> > >  > >to do with the non-legitimate so-called IDNO.  Please remove all
> > >  > >references to this organization.
> > >  > >
> > >  >
> > >  > The Name is not important for the Resolution of the GA.
> > >  > This is why I speak of an IC.
> > >
> > > I cannot support any motion that makes mention of the
> > so-called IDNO.
> >
> > Joe, we already know that you, and your elitist buddies, do not want
> > individuals to have any say, in any part of the Internet. I
> > bet you and Kent
> > still think "blue laws" are also appropriate and human-rights
> > is a figment
> > ... Yes, we are [through your repetitive ranting]
> > disgustingly well aware of
> > your views.
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>