Re: [ga-abuse] Cases 11, 21 & 23

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

Agreed.



At 12:21 PM 5/8/2001 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>I'd suggest deleting this sentence:
>
>At 17:44 07.05.2001 -0700, Kristy McKee wrote:
>>Of all the posts we received complaints about, I was able to identify one 
>>sentence that did not include an insult or insinuation.
>
>One of the two messages is only one sentence long; the other contains a fair
>amount of material that can be reasonably taken as "not an insult", for 
>instance:
>
>>  In fact lawyers tend to agree about basic matters of law most of the
>>  time.  When they disagree is when they are explicitly adversaries.  Lawyers
>>  are trained to seek whatever lines of argument will support their
>>  client.  However when they are not in the middle of a direct fight, they
>>  generally agree on matters of legal principals, and legal practise.
>
>of course it builds up to his stated opinion about mr. Froomkin, but in 
>itself, it is not an insult or insinuation.
>
>Apart from that - fine with me.
>
>           Harald