Re: [ga-abuse] Cases 11, 21 & 23

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@Alvestrand.no>]

I'd suggest deleting this sentence:

At 17:44 07.05.2001 -0700, Kristy McKee wrote:
>Of all the posts we received complaints about, I was able to identify one 
>sentence that did not include an insult or insinuation.

One of the two messages is only one sentence long; the other contains a fair
amount of material that can be reasonably taken as "not an insult", for 
instance:

>  In fact lawyers tend to agree about basic matters of law most of the
>  time.  When they disagree is when they are explicitly adversaries.  Lawyers
>  are trained to seek whatever lines of argument will support their
>  client.  However when they are not in the middle of a direct fight, they
>  generally agree on matters of legal principals, and legal practise.

of course it builds up to his stated opinion about mr. Froomkin, but in 
itself, it is not an insult or insinuation.

Apart from that - fine with me.

           Harald