[ga-abuse] Fw: [ga] DNSO/GA Blocking and other concerns

[Bruce James <bmj@keyname.net>]

I must complain about Jeff Williams using another email address to access
this ga list while he has been banned. I must also complain about a list
member who let him use his address to send messages to this list.

What do the List Monitors think the best course of action to be taken
against Mr. Williams and/or Mr. Kent Crispin?

/Bruce
"Let us reason together."


----- Original Message -----
From: "jwilliams" <jw@bywater.songbird.com>
To: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 21:05
Subject: Re: [ga] DNSO/GA Blocking and other concerns


Kent and all remaining assembly members,

First of all, on behalf of myself, Bob Davis, and all the other 118
thousand members of the INEG group, I want to thank Kent Crispin for
generously allowing me the use of an email address at Songbird.  And I
want to publically apologize for all the nasty things I have said about
Kent over the past two years -- I have now met him personally, and I
can honestly say that no finer human being walks on the face of the
earth.

Kent Crispin wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:15:53AM +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > We now have elected Chairs. A change of rule that the Chair must list
all
> > duly seconded motions and give the list the opportunity (72 hours?) to
> > lodge opposions, call for  amendments or for a vote would be completely
> > justified.
>
> Interesting.
>
> Motion 1: I move that the GA form a WG to examine the finances of each
> of the directors, and to recommend the removal of all directors with any
> conflicts of interest.

Second

> Motion 2: I move that the GA form a WG to examine the desirablitiy of
> turning ICANN into a for-profit corporation.

Second

> Motion 3: I move that the GA petition the NC for the immediate adoption
> of the GA as a constituency.

Second

> Motion 4: I move that control of all DNSO mailing lists be immediately
> turned over to a committee of volunteers, chaired by Kent Crispin.

Second, and I must say that the 118 million members of the INEG group
*unanimously* support this, as well.

> Motion 5: I move that the GA forward a resolution to the NC calling for
> the immediate suspension of the UDRP.

Second

> Five motions should be enough for today.  My good friend Jeff Williams
> will be seconding these momentarily.  I will be coming up with a few
> dozen more, tomorrow.

Keep up the good work, Kent :->

> I know that some of these are going to be
> unpopular, but I agree with you totally that it is vitally important
> that every one of them be taken to a full vote of the GA...

And the 14 million members of the INEG group also want to express their
gratitude to Joop Teernstra, for his brilliant suggestion that *every*
motion made and seconded *must* be voted on by the full GA.  That is
the only way we can ever possibly know what the GA thinks about these
vitally important issues.

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html