[ga-abuse] Complaint Against Eric Dierker

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

List Monitors

Complaint Against Eric Dierker
Grounds:    Personal Attack, Insults and Slander
(a)    That I abuse my position by the whim of an embodiment
(b)    That I dictate who is allowed rights and who is not.
(c)    That the appellate body spits on the rule of process
(d)    That the appellate body could not do more harm

Best regards
Patrick

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
To: <jandl@jandl.com>
Cc: Danny Younger <webmaster@babybows.com>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] List Monitors


> Dear Members,
> 
> I personally have been infected with cancer and I quickly learned you dang
> near have to kill the body in order to save it.  Well I survived and SOCANN
> ICANN.
> But we have to respect the dignity of due process of rules of order and of
> accountability of our leaders.  Personalities are secondary to the rules we
> all must follow, and one of the most widely accepted principles in this
> regard is that rules be laid out so that it is not the whim of an embodiment
> such as an alt-chair that dictates who is allowed rights and who is not.
> 
> The transition is over, Harald and Roberto are gone, we now must hold our
> officials to the fire.  We must set a bottoms up example for the NC and
> BoD.  OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO US.
> 
> Walsh just posted basically that we should judge not on affiliation but
> actions.  I agree but warn that sometimes an affiliation is an action.
> (KKK)(PLO)(CHRISTIAN)(CEO of ???) (BoD of ???)
> 
> If you can step back for a moment and not think I just complain and sour
> grapes and all, what happened to my appeal;? It was sent to the right places
> with confrimation and it just dissappeared. Let us assume I am a complete
> flake without cause, at least the appellate body shoud reject my appeal or
> deny my claim.  They have sent nothing and therefor spit on the rule of
> process.  They could not do more harm than to spit in your eye.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> JandL wrote:
> 
> > For the past few days, my inbox has been inundated with list
> > protocol and suspension...  Quite frankly I have better things to do
> > with my time than to read these messages.  There is work to be
> > done.
> >
> > In terms of Mr. Corliss taking action, I can certainly understand
> > wanting to bring this list back to some measure of decorum and
> > relevant subject matter.  It is regrettable to see that those who
> > opposed a person's individual affiliations are now on the attack to
> > remove him.  All I have seen are excessive posts from those people
> > with nothing constructive to offer wrt to issues facing the GA.
> >
> > Might we forego these attempts to disrupt the list and get back to
> > the issues most important to the Internet and the GA in particular?
> > Attempting to undermine the Chair and Co-Chair's efforts are not
> > going to help this body.
> >
> > Can we please see the WG lists established so that we can WORK?
> >
> > Leah
> >
> > > Dear Mr. Younger;
> > >
> > > This post is a fine example of the problems with the rules in place.
> > > Your first citation leads us to the rules you have cited very nicely.
> > > Upon reviewing these rules one finds all in order except that there is
> > > no mechanism to obtain a vote of the GA for the removal of a monitor.
> > > It also does not state what type of majority vote. So I guess we can
> > > assume that I may call for a vote right now to remove Mr. Corliss as a
> > > list monitor, due to obvious conflict of interest, and if 11 of us
> > > vote and 6 say remove he will be removed.  IN CASE THERE IS CONFUSION
> > > I NOW CALL FOR THAT VOTE.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Danny Younger wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Certain persons appointed by the GA Chair (the list monitors) have
> > > > the task of monitoring the list for posts that violate these rules.
> > > > These are selected by the GA Chair for a given period of time, but
> > > > may be removed from the role by the GA Chair or at their own request
> > > > at any time. A list monitor may also be removed by a majority vote
> > > > of the General Assembly.  Normally the appointment would be for 1
> > > > year." http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-ga-rules.html
> > > >
> > > > In response to a call for volunteers to serve as List Monitors,
> > > > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc07/msg00870.html I have been
> > > > advised of expressions of interest put forth by Bruce James, Kristy
> > > > McKee, Alexander Svensson, Patrick Corliss, and Harald Tveit
> > > > Alvestrand.  Accordingly, I now appoint these individuals to a one
> > > > year term as Monitors of the GA List.
> > > >
> > > > Danny Younger
> > > > GA Chair
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>