<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga-abuse] RE: [ga] Melbourne and nominations
At 23:09 18/02/2001 +1100, Dassa wrote:
>Okay Harald
>
>I'll make one final post on the matter.
>
>You would be fully aware that there has only been one recent suspension on
>the GA list. That of William Walsh, for raising IDNO matters and for so
>called attacks on Joop.
that suspension targeted 2 people. I take it from the above that you mean
the particular suspension of William Walsh.
>I have already stated what statement was false and offered to provide
>proof of the false statement. It is really inconsequental. What I do
>find interesting is your attitude.
You have not yet stated what you think that statement meant.
>As you obviously do not intend acting on the complaint I see no point in
>further communication regarding the matter.
I have considered the complaint and not found a reason to take action.
So yes, you are right.
>However, the exchange will be produced in evidence if I see a similar case
>where action is taken. The main point being that consistency is the rule.
The exchange is also CC:ed to ga-abuse@dnso.org in order to preserve it in
case it is needed in later discussions.
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|