RE: [ga-abuse] RE: [ga] Melbourne and nominations

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

Harald

I am not going to bandy words with you over this matter.  You suspended one member of the GA recently for remarks similar to those being made by JW.  Remarks and comments that continue after you posted a public warning regarding same.  If you don't wish to act in a fair manner, that is your perogative.  Just don't expect me to condone your actions.

If you can't see that attributing false opinions on another is an attack, I wonder what you do consider one.

Your actions and/or lack of them form my opinion of you.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

|>-----Original Message-----
|>From: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:Harald@Alvestrand.no]
|>Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 8:06 PM
|>To: dassa@dhs.org
|>Cc: ga-abuse@dnso.org
|>Subject: RE: [ga-abuse] RE: [ga] Melbourne and nominations
|>
|>
|>At 00:16 18/02/2001 +1100, Dassa wrote:
|>>As other members of the GA have been suspended for similar 
|>postings, you 
|>>can not apply the rules selectively.
|>
|>which example were you thinking of?
|>
|>
|>>|>Besides, I can't tell how he is attacking anyone here.
|>>
|>>I have stated the passage above is untrue and offered to 
|>provide evidence 
|>>in support of my claim.  The line, "We, unlike your view 
|>with respect to 
|>>Joop, do ..." is clearly an attack on me personally.
|>
|>but what is he saying about you?
|>That you think that Joop is trying to discourage someone from 
|>attending 
|>Melbourne?
|>
|>It's hard to know if it is an attack when I can't even parse 
|>his sentence.
|>
|>
|>
|>--
|>Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
|>+47 41 44 29 94
|>Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
|>
|>
|>