<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga-abuse] RE: [ga] Melbourne and nominations
At 00:16 18/02/2001 +1100, Dassa wrote:
>As other members of the GA have been suspended for similar postings, you
>can not apply the rules selectively.
which example were you thinking of?
>|>Besides, I can't tell how he is attacking anyone here.
>
>I have stated the passage above is untrue and offered to provide evidence
>in support of my claim. The line, "We, unlike your view with respect to
>Joop, do ..." is clearly an attack on me personally.
but what is he saying about you?
That you think that Joop is trying to discourage someone from attending
Melbourne?
It's hard to know if it is an attack when I can't even parse his sentence.
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|