Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting

["William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>]

On 06-Nov-99 Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 03:54:53PM -0500, Milton Mueller wrote:
>> This is simply not true at all. A license can be set, as NSI's is, for a
>> fixed term.
>> Such a decision is as easily revocable or reversible as if the license was
>> granted to
>> a non-profit.
> 
> You are confusing theory and practice.  If you revoke Chris Ambler's
> license to run as a for-profit, he will sue.  It doesn't matter what
> the merits are, he will fight it tooth and nail.  In fact, he would
> have a fiduciary obligation to his stockholders to do so, just as 
> NSI has had such an obligation.

Unless there is a clause in the delegation contract that specifically covers
this area.

--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934