Re: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )

["Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@nrw.net>]

Hallo,

I would like to add my support to that statement.

It really seem strange to me that now we start learning basics democraty about 
voting-procedures.


siegfried


On 22 Sep 99, at 11:22, Robert F. Connelly wrote:

> At 21:40 21-09-1999 -0400, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
> >  More than 70% of those expressing a view, though, were in
> >favor.  That is, by the end of Sept. 14, twenty-six people had sent
> >messages to this list weighing in on one side or the other.  Nineteen
> >people expressed support, and seven expressed opposition.  All of these
> >messages were sent to the public list.
> 
> Dear Jonathan and Javier:
> 
> In my opinion, you two have acted quite responsibly on this 
> issue.  Recognising that Jonathan and Javier hold opposing views, it is 
> heartening to see the matter handles in such a democratic manner.
> 
> I feel I should apologize for my "cousin Kevin" to imply that the 
> determination was made in an imperious manner.
> 
> Congratulations and *thanks* for your *thank-less* efforts;-)
> 
> Personal regards,
> BobC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "One test is worth three expert opinions!"
> Ulric B. Bray
>