[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:51:35 -0700
In-Reply-To: <s7c52cd1.066@gw1.rspab.com>; from Kevin J. Connolly on Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 12:02:05PM -0400
Mail-Followup-To: wg-c@dnso.org
References: <s7c52cd1.066@gw1.rspab.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 12:02:05PM -0400, Kevin J. Connolly wrote:
[...]
> (B) A registry is only a monopoly within the context of its TLD. 
> Inter-registry competition is a realistic possibility. 

For new registrations... but renewals seem very insensitive to 
competition.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain

References:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread