[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted



Neither have I, but knowing Chris, I am willing to take the claim at
face value.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> Robert F. Connelly
> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 1999 12:39 AM
> To: wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted
>
>
> At 22:52 13-08-99 -0700, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
> >Only because the applicants erred in their filing. I believe that IOD
> >succeeded.
>
> I've heard the boast -- but have not seen the Letters Patent.  BobC
>