(Fwd) Re: sovereignty meaning attached to domain names

["Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@nrw.net>]

Forwarded message:
From:     Self <Single-user mode>
To: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Subject: Re: sovereignty meaning attached to domain names
Reply-to: svl@nrw.net
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:35:54 +0100

On 28 Jan 99, at 8:53, Kent Crispin wrote:

[...]
> 
> Christopher Wilkinsen has proposed a "public sector" constituency; 
> INTA has proposed a constituency for consumer groups, charities, 
> advocacy groups, and so on; Christopher in a private conversation 
> has indicated that he intended his proposal to include groups not 
> necessarily associated with governments.  Personally, I think we 
> should add a constituency, and call it a "public agency" 
> constituency, or something like that.
> 
> Comments?

perhaps just replace at large members within dnso ?
I guess the right place for those is at a higher level , i.e. same level as 
SO´s.
siegfried

> 
> -- 
> Kent Crispin, PAB Chair				"Do good, and you'll be
> kent@songbird.com				lonesome." -- Mark Twain
>