Subject: GA-DIGEST V1 #834
From: [email-masked] (GA-DIGEST)
To: [email-masked]

GA-DIGEST          Tuesday, November 6 2001          Volume 01 : Number 834

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 20:21:37 -0500
From: Dan Steinberg <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

Can't do anything about the MS word format other than pass on the request to have
it up in HTML so everyone else can read it
But rest assured the task force didn't spend all this time developing a
questionnaire to not track the answers.  Give the DNSO secretariat a few days to
put up relpy instructions.  I believe the intent was to get the questionnaire up
ASAP since we had slipped a day or two on the schedule and didnt figure anyone
had finished replying already.

Kristy McKee wrote:

> So, in addition to using MS Word format on the Internet, they are asking
> the questions; but they are not tracking the answers.
>
> Why even bother?  This is a silly as signing up to be part of the BC
> without an invitation from one of the First Level ISPs.
>
> Of course, the people haven't changed, so I suppose they don't know why
> it's rude to use MS Word or why it's stupid to take a poll and be so
> obvious about not collecting the information or wanting to provide a
> vehicle for public participation.
>
> Get Off Line or Get on the Internet, this intermediate stage is grueling.
>
> ~k
>
> At 11:58 AM 11/5/2001 -0500, [email-masked] wrote:
> >The UDRP Task Force has produced a questionnaire which is posted at
> >http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-udrp/Arc00/doc00007.doc
> >
> >I encourage every member of this Assembly to respond to this questionnaire.
> >At this time, it is still not clear to which address responses should be
> >sent, but I hope to have that answer for you soon.
> >
> >The questionnaire will soon be made available in French and Spanish, and the
> >deadline for all replies is set for December 17.
> >--
> >This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> >Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

- --
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:[email-masked]

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 20:35:41 -0500
From: Dan Steinberg <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

not sure if this went out or not 'cause my non-MS browser crashed just as it was
sending with all sorts of abnormal program termination errors...if you have already
received this message, my apologies.

Dan Steinberg wrote:

> Can't do anything about the MS word format other than pass on the request to have
> it up in HTML so everyone else can read it
> But rest assured the task force didn't spend all this time developing a
> questionnaire to not track the answers.  Give the DNSO secretariat a few days to
> put up relpy instructions.  I believe the intent was to get the questionnaire up
> ASAP since we had slipped a day or two on the schedule and didnt figure anyone
> had finished replying already.
>
> Kristy McKee wrote:
>
> > So, in addition to using MS Word format on the Internet, they are asking
> > the questions; but they are not tracking the answers.
> >
> > Why even bother?  This is a silly as signing up to be part of the BC
> > without an invitation from one of the First Level ISPs.
> >
> > Of course, the people haven't changed, so I suppose they don't know why
> > it's rude to use MS Word or why it's stupid to take a poll and be so
> > obvious about not collecting the information or wanting to provide a
> > vehicle for public participation.
> >
> > Get Off Line or Get on the Internet, this intermediate stage is grueling.
> >
> > ~k
> >
> > At 11:58 AM 11/5/2001 -0500, [email-masked] wrote:
> > >The UDRP Task Force has produced a questionnaire which is posted at
> > >http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-udrp/Arc00/doc00007.doc
> > >
> > >I encourage every member of this Assembly to respond to this questionnaire.
> > >At this time, it is still not clear to which address responses should be
> > >sent, but I hope to have that answer for you soon.
> > >
> > >The questionnaire will soon be made available in French and Spanish, and the
> > >deadline for all replies is set for December 17.
> > >--
> > >This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > >Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> Dan Steinberg
>
> SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> 35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
> Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
> J9B 1N1                 e-mail:[email-masked]

- --
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:[email-masked]

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 17:56:32 -0800
From: Eric Dierker <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

This is just gut wrenching hilarious.  I don't care how serious it is.  It could
not be any better scripted in a Ludlum farce of Mel Brooks satire.  ICANN spends
500 thousand dollars on a committee that creates a document that likely carries a
virus, Clanceys' NetForce could not come up with this scenario.

Then they declare a credible threat to the ICANN meeting, invite everyone to
attend and then send them across the street to the completely insecure Tiki Room.

Come on, where is that guy that does the ICANN animated clips.  I was trying to
think of something more ridiculous just for a fun comparison, but I found that I
could not top this, and then I got a cold sweat when I realized all of my
scenarios could come true.

The term "criminally stupid" comes to mind.

Later I will announce a location for a party for any and all who want to laugh and
cry together after the first public meeting regarding this sit-com.  Both Bill and
Jeff are invited and gloves are totally optional.

Quite Sincerely,
Eric

PS. If you are hesitating on coming please do, I will make it worth your while
with a tour of the famous Venice Beach, believe me it is not as Freaky as ICANN
but it is real.  We can always drop down and see the Queen Mary and the Spruce
Goose--good ideas but bad execution, sound familiar.

Jeff Williams wrote:

> Danny and all assembly members,
>
>   As you know .doc files are well known to carry viruses.  Will there
> be a HTML version available?
>
> [email-masked] wrote:
>
> > The UDRP Task Force has produced a questionnaire which is posted at
> > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-udrp/Arc00/doc00007.doc
> >
> > I encourage every member of this Assembly to respond to this questionnaire.
> > At this time, it is still not clear to which address responses should be
> > sent, but I hope to have that answer for you soon.
> >
> > The questionnaire will soon be made available in French and Spanish, and the
> > deadline for all replies is set for December 17.
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail [email-masked]
> Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 19:43:06 -0800
From: "Tim Langdell" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

Huh? The Spruce Goose was surely moved up to Oregon in the early 1990s ...
Or was that (somehow) your point? :)

Tim

<snip>
>
> Quite Sincerely,
> Eric
>
> PS. If you are hesitating on coming please do, I will make it worth your
while
> with a tour of the famous Venice Beach, believe me it is not as Freaky as
ICANN
> but it is real.  We can always drop down and see the Queen Mary and the
Spruce
> Goose--good ideas but bad execution, sound familiar.

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 20:19:39 -0800 
From: Roeland Meyer <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

You over-react to a mis-understanding. No one is accusing the task force of
distributing a virus. What is, in fact, being stated is that the
distribution, BECAUSE it is a DOC file, will be less than complete. That it
will not reach its intended audience. More and more sites re-route DOC file
attachment s to /dev/nul as a matter of course. As a matter of fact, it is
begining to become a real problem. SirCam and Nimda both create DOC files
and send them out as file attachments. Without special software, it is
impossible to know whether or not a DOC file contains a virus until it is
opened and activated. Once you have done that, there is no way to prevent
the infestation. Many sites take the security precaution of deleting ALL
attached DOC files. They also do this with EXE and COM files. Some are also
begining to do it with PDF files, as well.

This is not a subject of halarity, it is very sad. It is one of the things
damaging public trust in the Internet, as a whole. As a techie/marketer,
this makes my job very difficult. As a shareholder in an internet based
business, it causes deep concern.

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: Eric Dierker [mailto:[email-masked]]
|> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 5:57 PM
|> To: Jeff Williams
|> Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
|> Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire
|> 
|> 
|> This is just gut wrenching hilarious.  I don't care how 
|> serious it is.  It could
|> not be any better scripted in a Ludlum farce of Mel Brooks 
|> satire.  ICANN spends
|> 500 thousand dollars on a committee that creates a document 
|> that likely carries a
|> virus, Clanceys' NetForce could not come up with this scenario.
|> 
|> Then they declare a credible threat to the ICANN meeting, 
|> invite everyone to
|> attend and then send them across the street to the 
|> completely insecure Tiki Room.
|> 
|> Come on, where is that guy that does the ICANN animated 
|> clips.  I was trying to
|> think of something more ridiculous just for a fun 
|> comparison, but I found that I
|> could not top this, and then I got a cold sweat when I 
|> realized all of my
|> scenarios could come true.
|> 
|> The term "criminally stupid" comes to mind.
|> 
|> Later I will announce a location for a party for any and all 
|> who want to laugh and
|> cry together after the first public meeting regarding this 
|> sit-com.  Both Bill and
|> Jeff are invited and gloves are totally optional.
|> 
|> Quite Sincerely,
|> Eric
|> 
|> PS. If you are hesitating on coming please do, I will make 
|> it worth your while
|> with a tour of the famous Venice Beach, believe me it is not 
|> as Freaky as ICANN
|> but it is real.  We can always drop down and see the Queen 
|> Mary and the Spruce
|> Goose--good ideas but bad execution, sound familiar.
|> 
|> Jeff Williams wrote:
|> 
|> > Danny and all assembly members,
|> >
|> >   As you know .doc files are well known to carry viruses.  
|> Will there
|> > be a HTML version available?
|> >
|> > [email-masked] wrote:
|> >
|> > > The UDRP Task Force has produced a questionnaire which 
|> is posted at
|> > > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-udrp/Arc00/doc00007.doc
|> > >
|> > > I encourage every member of this Assembly to respond to 
|> this questionnaire.
|> > > At this time, it is still not clear to which address 
|> responses should be
|> > > sent, but I hope to have that answer for you soon.
|> > >
|> > > The questionnaire will soon be made available in French 
|> and Spanish, and the
|> > > deadline for all replies is set for December 17.
|> > > --
|> > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
|> > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
|> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
|> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
|> >
|> > Regards,
|> >
|> > --
|> > Jeffrey A. Williams
|> > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
|> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
|> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
|> > E-Mail [email-masked]
|> > Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
|> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
|> >
|> > --
|> > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
|> > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
|> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
|> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
|> 
|> --
|> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
|> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
|> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
|> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
|> 
- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 22:31:12 -0800
From: Jeff Williams <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

Roeland and all assembly members,

  Yes again Eric did miss the point entirely.  :(  You are of course
quite right in you comments Roeland.  I tried to be brief without
unduly or unjustifiably criticizing the Task Force and the NC.

Roeland Meyer wrote:

> You over-react to a mis-understanding. No one is accusing the task force of
> distributing a virus. What is, in fact, being stated is that the
> distribution, BECAUSE it is a DOC file, will be less than complete. That it
> will not reach its intended audience. More and more sites re-route DOC file
> attachment s to /dev/nul as a matter of course. As a matter of fact, it is
> begining to become a real problem. SirCam and Nimda both create DOC files
> and send them out as file attachments. Without special software, it is
> impossible to know whether or not a DOC file contains a virus until it is
> opened and activated. Once you have done that, there is no way to prevent
> the infestation. Many sites take the security precaution of deleting ALL
> attached DOC files. They also do this with EXE and COM files. Some are also
> begining to do it with PDF files, as well.
>
> This is not a subject of halarity, it is very sad. It is one of the things
> damaging public trust in the Internet, as a whole. As a techie/marketer,
> this makes my job very difficult. As a shareholder in an internet based
> business, it causes deep concern.
>
> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: Eric Dierker [mailto:[email-masked]]
> |> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 5:57 PM
> |> To: Jeff Williams
> |> Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> |> Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire
> |>
> |>
> |> This is just gut wrenching hilarious.  I don't care how
> |> serious it is.  It could
> |> not be any better scripted in a Ludlum farce of Mel Brooks
> |> satire.  ICANN spends
> |> 500 thousand dollars on a committee that creates a document
> |> that likely carries a
> |> virus, Clanceys' NetForce could not come up with this scenario.
> |>
> |> Then they declare a credible threat to the ICANN meeting,
> |> invite everyone to
> |> attend and then send them across the street to the
> |> completely insecure Tiki Room.
> |>
> |> Come on, where is that guy that does the ICANN animated
> |> clips.  I was trying to
> |> think of something more ridiculous just for a fun
> |> comparison, but I found that I
> |> could not top this, and then I got a cold sweat when I
> |> realized all of my
> |> scenarios could come true.
> |>
> |> The term "criminally stupid" comes to mind.
> |>
> |> Later I will announce a location for a party for any and all
> |> who want to laugh and
> |> cry together after the first public meeting regarding this
> |> sit-com.  Both Bill and
> |> Jeff are invited and gloves are totally optional.
> |>
> |> Quite Sincerely,
> |> Eric
> |>
> |> PS. If you are hesitating on coming please do, I will make
> |> it worth your while
> |> with a tour of the famous Venice Beach, believe me it is not
> |> as Freaky as ICANN
> |> but it is real.  We can always drop down and see the Queen
> |> Mary and the Spruce
> |> Goose--good ideas but bad execution, sound familiar.
> |>
> |> Jeff Williams wrote:
> |>
> |> > Danny and all assembly members,
> |> >
> |> >   As you know .doc files are well known to carry viruses.
> |> Will there
> |> > be a HTML version available?
> |> >
> |> > [email-masked] wrote:
> |> >
> |> > > The UDRP Task Force has produced a questionnaire which
> |> is posted at
> |> > > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-udrp/Arc00/doc00007.doc
> |> > >
> |> > > I encourage every member of this Assembly to respond to
> |> this questionnaire.
> |> > > At this time, it is still not clear to which address
> |> responses should be
> |> > > sent, but I hope to have that answer for you soon.
> |> > >
> |> > > The questionnaire will soon be made available in French
> |> and Spanish, and the
> |> > > deadline for all replies is set for December 17.
> |> > > --
> |> > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> |> > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> |> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> |> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> |> >
> |> > Regards,
> |> >
> |> > --
> |> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> |> > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> |> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> |> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> |> > E-Mail [email-masked]
> |> > Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> |> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> |> >
> |> > --
> |> > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> |> > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> |> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> |> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> |>
> |> --
> |> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> |> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> |> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> |> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> |>

Regards,

- --
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email-masked]
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 23:54:50 EST
From: [email-masked]
Subject: [ga] The "Official" ALSC Report is Posted

http://www.atlargestudy.org/final_report.shtml

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 21:29:50 -0800
From: Eric Dierker <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

Bull pucky to both of you.

Pull it up and see that your Norton does not do an SOS.  You two bad ass
intellectual programmers crack me up.  I do not accuse anyone, I state fact.  So
Jeff take your point entirely and relieve us of your sophistry.  It is poison and
you two are still invited to my party in MDR.  Come on it is a quick and
beautiful drive down the coast for you Roeland and a short 3 hour flight for you
Jeff.  If money or security is the issue I got you both covered-- I have a 44 and
bring your sleeping bags I have a room, all right we will chip in for gas too.
Dang I already have about five takers, this should be fun.  Any self respecting
women should probably make alternative arrangements.  Brett and Josh you two are
in the area can you take overflow as long as they promise to behave?

Hey folks I am making light simply to show that we have small differences and
that if we get together we can make a difference.  Jeff and Roeland are right, I
wrote in an overreacting way, but it was to nudge a few fence sitters into
action.  I truly believe that this group is ready to do well.  Just getting
together will be all the catalyst we need.  Remember "we don't need no stinkin
badges".

Eric

Thank you Jeff and Roeland for your hard work and caring

Jeff Williams wrote:

> Roeland and all assembly members,
>
>   Yes again Eric did miss the point entirely.  :(  You are of course
> quite right in you comments Roeland.  I tried to be brief without
> unduly or unjustifiably criticizing the Task Force and the NC.
>
> Roeland Meyer wrote:
>
> > You over-react to a mis-understanding. No one is accusing the task force of
> > distributing a virus. What is, in fact, being stated is that the
> > distribution, BECAUSE it is a DOC file, will be less than complete. That it
> > will not reach its intended audience. More and more sites re-route DOC file
> > attachment s to /dev/nul as a matter of course. As a matter of fact, it is
> > begining to become a real problem. SirCam and Nimda both create DOC files
> > and send them out as file attachments. Without special software, it is
> > impossible to know whether or not a DOC file contains a virus until it is
> > opened and activated. Once you have done that, there is no way to prevent
> > the infestation. Many sites take the security precaution of deleting ALL
> > attached DOC files. They also do this with EXE and COM files. Some are also
> > begining to do it with PDF files, as well.
> >
> > This is not a subject of halarity, it is very sad. It is one of the things
> > damaging public trust in the Internet, as a whole. As a techie/marketer,
> > this makes my job very difficult. As a shareholder in an internet based
> > business, it causes deep concern.
> >
> > |> -----Original Message-----
> > |> From: Eric Dierker [mailto:[email-masked]]
> > |> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 5:57 PM
> > |> To: Jeff Williams
> > |> Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> > |> Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire
> > |>
> > |>
> > |> This is just gut wrenching hilarious.  I don't care how
> > |> serious it is.  It could
> > |> not be any better scripted in a Ludlum farce of Mel Brooks
> > |> satire.  ICANN spends
> > |> 500 thousand dollars on a committee that creates a document
> > |> that likely carries a
> > |> virus, Clanceys' NetForce could not come up with this scenario.
> > |>
> > |> Then they declare a credible threat to the ICANN meeting,
> > |> invite everyone to
> > |> attend and then send them across the street to the
> > |> completely insecure Tiki Room.
> > |>
> > |> Come on, where is that guy that does the ICANN animated
> > |> clips.  I was trying to
> > |> think of something more ridiculous just for a fun
> > |> comparison, but I found that I
> > |> could not top this, and then I got a cold sweat when I
> > |> realized all of my
> > |> scenarios could come true.
> > |>
> > |> The term "criminally stupid" comes to mind.
> > |>
> > |> Later I will announce a location for a party for any and all
> > |> who want to laugh and
> > |> cry together after the first public meeting regarding this
> > |> sit-com.  Both Bill and
> > |> Jeff are invited and gloves are totally optional.
> > |>
> > |> Quite Sincerely,
> > |> Eric
> > |>
> > |> PS. If you are hesitating on coming please do, I will make
> > |> it worth your while
> > |> with a tour of the famous Venice Beach, believe me it is not
> > |> as Freaky as ICANN
> > |> but it is real.  We can always drop down and see the Queen
> > |> Mary and the Spruce
> > |> Goose--good ideas but bad execution, sound familiar.
> > |>
> > |> Jeff Williams wrote:
> > |>
> > |> > Danny and all assembly members,
> > |> >
> > |> >   As you know .doc files are well known to carry viruses.
> > |> Will there
> > |> > be a HTML version available?
> > |> >
> > |> > [email-masked] wrote:
> > |> >
> > |> > > The UDRP Task Force has produced a questionnaire which
> > |> is posted at
> > |> > > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-udrp/Arc00/doc00007.doc
> > |> > >
> > |> > > I encourage every member of this Assembly to respond to
> > |> this questionnaire.
> > |> > > At this time, it is still not clear to which address
> > |> responses should be
> > |> > > sent, but I hope to have that answer for you soon.
> > |> > >
> > |> > > The questionnaire will soon be made available in French
> > |> and Spanish, and the
> > |> > > deadline for all replies is set for December 17.
> > |> > > --
> > |> > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > |> > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > |> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > |> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > |> >
> > |> > Regards,
> > |> >
> > |> > --
> > |> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > |> > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> > |> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > |> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > |> > E-Mail [email-masked]
> > |> > Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> > |> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> > |> >
> > |> > --
> > |> > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > |> > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > |> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > |> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > |>
> > |> --
> > |> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> > |> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> > |> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > |> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > |>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail [email-masked]
> Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:38:16 -0500 (EST)
From: Paul Svensson <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 [email-masked] wrote:

>The UDRP Task Force has produced a questionnaire which is posted at 
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-udrp/Arc00/doc00007.doc
>
>I encourage every member of this Assembly to respond to this questionnaire.  
>At this time, it is still not clear to which address responses should be 
>sent, but I hope to have that answer for you soon.

I would be more inclined to look at something
that was posted in a more accessible format.
For this purpose, what's wrong with text/plain ?

	/Paul

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 06:48:37 -0500
From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

as a "non tecchie" i would sincerely appreciate someone letting me know what
format they suggest i should put attachments in to in order to provide
reasonable assurance that the attachment won't get "re-routed"

ken stubbs

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Roeland Meyer" <[email-masked]>
To: "'Eric Dierker'" <[email-masked]>; "Jeff Williams"
<[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:19 PM
Subject: RE: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

> You over-react to a mis-understanding. No one is accusing the task force
of
> distributing a virus. What is, in fact, being stated is that the
> distribution, BECAUSE it is a DOC file, will be less than complete. That
it
> will not reach its intended audience. More and more sites re-route DOC
file
> attachment s to /dev/nul as a matter of course. As a matter of fact, it is
> begining to become a real problem. SirCam and Nimda both create DOC files
> and send them out as file attachments. Without special software, it is
> impossible to know whether or not a DOC file contains a virus until it is
> opened and activated. Once you have done that, there is no way to prevent
> the infestation. Many sites take the security precaution of deleting ALL
> attached DOC files. They also do this with EXE and COM files. Some are
also
> begining to do it with PDF files, as well.
>
> This is not a subject of halarity, it is very sad. It is one of the things
> damaging public trust in the Internet, as a whole. As a techie/marketer,
> this makes my job very difficult. As a shareholder in an internet based
> business, it causes deep concern.
>
> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: Eric Dierker [mailto:[email-masked]]
> |> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 5:57 PM
> |> To: Jeff Williams
> |> Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> |> Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire
> |>
> |>
> |> This is just gut wrenching hilarious.  I don't care how
> |> serious it is.  It could
> |> not be any better scripted in a Ludlum farce of Mel Brooks
> |> satire.  ICANN spends
> |> 500 thousand dollars on a committee that creates a document
> |> that likely carries a
> |> virus, Clanceys' NetForce could not come up with this scenario.
> |>
> |> Then they declare a credible threat to the ICANN meeting,
> |> invite everyone to
> |> attend and then send them across the street to the
> |> completely insecure Tiki Room.
> |>
> |> Come on, where is that guy that does the ICANN animated
> |> clips.  I was trying to
> |> think of something more ridiculous just for a fun
> |> comparison, but I found that I
> |> could not top this, and then I got a cold sweat when I
> |> realized all of my
> |> scenarios could come true.
> |>
> |> The term "criminally stupid" comes to mind.
> |>
> |> Later I will announce a location for a party for any and all
> |> who want to laugh and
> |> cry together after the first public meeting regarding this
> |> sit-com.  Both Bill and
> |> Jeff are invited and gloves are totally optional.
> |>
> |> Quite Sincerely,
> |> Eric
> |>
> |> PS. If you are hesitating on coming please do, I will make
> |> it worth your while
> |> with a tour of the famous Venice Beach, believe me it is not
> |> as Freaky as ICANN
> |> but it is real.  We can always drop down and see the Queen
> |> Mary and the Spruce
> |> Goose--good ideas but bad execution, sound familiar.
> |>
> |> Jeff Williams wrote:
> |>
> |> > Danny and all assembly members,
> |> >
> |> >   As you know .doc files are well known to carry viruses.
> |> Will there
> |> > be a HTML version available?
> |> >
> |> > [email-masked] wrote:
> |> >
> |> > > The UDRP Task Force has produced a questionnaire which
> |> is posted at
> |> > > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-udrp/Arc00/doc00007.doc
> |> > >
> |> > > I encourage every member of this Assembly to respond to
> |> this questionnaire.
> |> > > At this time, it is still not clear to which address
> |> responses should be
> |> > > sent, but I hope to have that answer for you soon.
> |> > >
> |> > > The questionnaire will soon be made available in French
> |> and Spanish, and the
> |> > > deadline for all replies is set for December 17.
> |> > > --
> |> > > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> |> > > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> |> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> |> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> |> >
> |> > Regards,
> |> >
> |> > --
> |> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> |> > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> |> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> |> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> |> > E-Mail [email-masked]
> |> > Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> |> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> |> >
> |> > --
> |> > This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> |> > Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> |> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> |> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> |>
> |> --
> |> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> |> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> |> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> |> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> |>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 03:58:53 -0800
From: William X Walsh <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

Tuesday, Tuesday, November 06, 2001, 3:48:37 AM, Ken Stubbs wrote:

> as a "non tecchie" i would sincerely appreciate someone letting me know what
> format they suggest i should put attachments in to in order to provide
> reasonable assurance that the attachment won't get "re-routed"

Perhaps not using an attachment, and posting it in plain text, putting
an html version up on a website, etc.

You can provide a word doc format for those who want it, save it in
html (Word supports this), and in plain text, put them on a website
and let the end users select which format they prefer.

This is how I did the letter from domain resellers regarding
the Verisign transfer policy.

- -- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <[email-masked]>
- --

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 07:01:16 -0500
From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

thanks for the suggestion

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "William X Walsh" <[email-masked]>
To: "Ken Stubbs" <[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 6:58 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] UDRP Task Force Questionnaire

> Tuesday, Tuesday, November 06, 2001, 3:48:37 AM, Ken Stubbs wrote:
>
> > as a "non tecchie" i would sincerely appreciate someone letting me know
what
> > format they suggest i should put attachments in to in order to provide
> > reasonable assurance that the attachment won't get "re-routed"
>
> Perhaps not using an attachment, and posting it in plain text, putting
> an html version up on a website, etc.
>
> You can provide a word doc format for those who want it, save it in
> html (Word supports this), and in plain text, put them on a website
> and let the end users select which format they prefer.
>
> This is how I did the letter from domain resellers regarding
> the Verisign transfer policy.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <[email-masked]>
> --
>
>

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

End of GA-DIGEST V1 #834
************************