Subject: GA-DIGEST V1 #750
From: [email-masked] (GA-DIGEST)
To: [email-masked]

GA-DIGEST          Friday, September 21 2001          Volume 01 : Number 750

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:12:35 +0200
From: "Philip Sheppard" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] A message from Stuart Lynn regarding the next ICANN meeting

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_00E2_01C141BC.C50B6540
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

To the ICANN community:

Some of you  have enquired whether the ICANN Marina del Rey meeting=20
will go forward as scheduled in November in the light of last week's=20
tragic events in New York and Washington.

As of now the meeting will be held as scheduled in Marina del Rey.=20
This might well change if international events nearer the time unfold=20
in such a way as to make it extremely difficult or impossible to=20
attend. Regardless, we also want to be sensitive to the wishes of the=20
ICANN community, particularly those who would have to travel far to=20
reach Los Angeles.

Although last week's events are still devastatingly fresh in all our=20
minds, we would  appreciate it if you would share your current=20
thinking as to whether your plans to travel to Marina del Rey  are=20
likely to change--  or any other advice you may have regarding the=20
November meeting. Again, we would particularly appreciate hearing=20
from those of you who would have to travel from afar.

For planning purposes, we will make a final decision by Wednesday,=20
September 26, so your early response would be greatly appreciated.

Please send any comments to [email-masked].
____________________

__________________
Stuart Lynn
President and CEO
ICANN
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel: 310-823-9358
Fax: 310-823-8649
Email: [email-masked]

- ------=_NextPart_000_00E2_01C141BC.C50B6540
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><FONT size=3D3>To the ICANN community:<BR><BR>Some =
of you&nbsp;=20
have enquired whether the ICANN Marina del Rey meeting <BR>will go =
forward as=20
scheduled in November in the light of last week's <BR>tragic events in =
New York=20
and Washington.<BR><BR>As of now the meeting will be held as scheduled =
in Marina=20
del Rey. <BR>This might well change if international events nearer the =
time=20
unfold <BR>in such a way as to make it extremely difficult or impossible =
to=20
<BR>attend. Regardless, we also want to be sensitive to the wishes of =
the=20
<BR>ICANN community, particularly those who would have to travel far to=20
<BR>reach Los Angeles.<BR><BR>Although last week's events are still=20
devastatingly fresh in all our <BR>minds, we would&nbsp; appreciate it =
if you=20
would share your current <BR>thinking as to whether your plans to travel =
to=20
Marina del Rey&nbsp; are <BR>likely to change--&nbsp; or any other =
advice you=20
may have regarding the <BR>November meeting. Again, we would =
particularly=20
appreciate hearing <BR>from those of you who would have to travel from=20
afar.<BR><BR>For planning purposes, we will make a final decision by =
Wednesday,=20
<BR>September 26, so your early response would be greatly=20
appreciated.<BR><BR>Please send any comments to </FONT><A=20
href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]"><FONT =
size=3D3>[email-masked]</FONT></A><FONT=20
size=3D3>.<BR>____________________<BR><BR><BR>__________________<BR>Stuar=
t=20
Lynn<BR>President and CEO<BR>ICANN<BR>4676 Admiralty Way, Suite =
330<BR>Marina=20
del Rey, CA 90292<BR>Tel: 310-823-9358<BR>Fax: 310-823-8649<BR>Email: =
</FONT><A=20
href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]"><FONT=20
size=3D3>[email-masked]</FONT></A><BR><BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_00E2_01C141BC.C50B6540--

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:50:53 -0300
From: "Antonio Harris" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] RE: [council] A message from Stuart Lynn regarding the next ICANN meeting

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0037_01C141CA.80452960
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Philip,

Barring any unforeseeable impediments, I plan to attend the meeting.
I see no greater risk in this than in living in Argentina, since this
country has been the target of two terrorist bombing attacks, in
recent years, both of which devastated the Israeli Embassy and
the Jewish Community Organization, with over two hundred
people killed as well as those injured, many of them non-Jewish
residents of this country.

Regards

Tony Harris
  ----- Mensaje original -----=20
  De: Philip Sheppard=20
  Para: NC (list)=20
  CC: GA List=20
  Enviado: Jueves 20 de Septiembre de 2001 05:12
  Asunto: [council] A message from Stuart Lynn regarding the next ICANN =
meeting

  To the ICANN community:

  Some of you  have enquired whether the ICANN Marina del Rey meeting=20
  will go forward as scheduled in November in the light of last week's=20
  tragic events in New York and Washington.

  As of now the meeting will be held as scheduled in Marina del Rey.=20
  This might well change if international events nearer the time unfold=20
  in such a way as to make it extremely difficult or impossible to=20
  attend. Regardless, we also want to be sensitive to the wishes of the=20
  ICANN community, particularly those who would have to travel far to=20
  reach Los Angeles.

  Although last week's events are still devastatingly fresh in all our=20
  minds, we would  appreciate it if you would share your current=20
  thinking as to whether your plans to travel to Marina del Rey  are=20
  likely to change--  or any other advice you may have regarding the=20
  November meeting. Again, we would particularly appreciate hearing=20
  from those of you who would have to travel from afar.

  For planning purposes, we will make a final decision by Wednesday,=20
  September 26, so your early response would be greatly appreciated.

  Please send any comments to [email-masked].
  ____________________

  __________________
  Stuart Lynn
  President and CEO
  ICANN
  4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
  Marina del Rey, CA 90292
  Tel: 310-823-9358
  Fax: 310-823-8649
  Email: [email-masked]

- ------=_NextPart_000_0037_01C141CA.80452960
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Philip,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Barring any unforeseeable impediments, I plan to =
attend the=20
meeting.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I see no greater risk in this than in living in =
Argentina,=20
since this</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>country has been the target of two terrorist bombing =
attacks,=20
in</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>recent years, both of which devastated the Israeli =
Embassy=20
and</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>the Jewish Community Organization, with over two=20
hundred</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>people killed as well as those injured, many of them =

non-Jewish</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>residents of this country.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Regards</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Tony Harris</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Mensaje original ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>De:</B> <A=20
  href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]" =
title=[email-masked]>Philip=20
  Sheppard</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Para:</B> <A =
href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]"=20
  title=[email-masked]>NC (list)</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>CC:</B> <A =
href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]"=20
  title=[email-masked]>GA List</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Enviado:</B> Jueves 20 de =
Septiembre de 2001=20
  05:12</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Asunto:</B> [council] A message =
from Stuart=20
  Lynn regarding the next ICANN meeting</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2><FONT size=3D3>To the ICANN community:<BR><BR>Some =
of=20
  you&nbsp; have enquired whether the ICANN Marina del Rey meeting =
<BR>will go=20
  forward as scheduled in November in the light of last week's =
<BR>tragic events=20
  in New York and Washington.<BR><BR>As of now the meeting will be held =
as=20
  scheduled in Marina del Rey. <BR>This might well change if =
international=20
  events nearer the time unfold <BR>in such a way as to make it =
extremely=20
  difficult or impossible to <BR>attend. Regardless, we also want to be=20
  sensitive to the wishes of the <BR>ICANN community, particularly those =
who=20
  would have to travel far to <BR>reach Los Angeles.<BR><BR>Although =
last week's=20
  events are still devastatingly fresh in all our <BR>minds, we =
would&nbsp;=20
  appreciate it if you would share your current <BR>thinking as to =
whether your=20
  plans to travel to Marina del Rey&nbsp; are <BR>likely to =
change--&nbsp; or=20
  any other advice you may have regarding the <BR>November meeting. =
Again, we=20
  would particularly appreciate hearing <BR>from those of you who would =
have to=20
  travel from afar.<BR><BR>For planning purposes, we will make a final =
decision=20
  by Wednesday, <BR>September 26, so your early response would be =
greatly=20
  appreciated.<BR><BR>Please send any comments to </FONT><A=20
  href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]"><FONT =
size=3D3>[email-masked]</FONT></A><FONT=20
  =
size=3D3>.<BR>____________________<BR><BR><BR>__________________<BR>Stuar=
t=20
  Lynn<BR>President and CEO<BR>ICANN<BR>4676 Admiralty Way, Suite =
330<BR>Marina=20
  del Rey, CA 90292<BR>Tel: 310-823-9358<BR>Fax: 310-823-8649<BR>Email:=20
  </FONT><A href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]"><FONT=20
  =
size=3D3>[email-masked]</FONT></A><BR><BR></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BOD=
Y></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0037_01C141CA.80452960--

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:05:02 -0400
From: [email-masked]
Subject: [ga] ICANN Litigation Documents

ICANN Litigation Documents posted:  http://www.icann.org/legal/litigation.htm

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:07:06 -0400
From: [email-masked]
Subject: [ga] Registrars Draft:  Transfers

Inter-Registrar Transfers Draft Document posted by the Registrar Constituency:
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc01/doc00057.doc

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Patrick Greenwell <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN Litigation Documents

On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 [email-masked] wrote:

> ICANN Litigation Documents posted:  http://www.icann.org/legal/litigation.htm

Cool, ICANN counsel are as arrogant in legal documents as they are with
everyone else. :-)

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
                               Patrick Greenwell
                       Earth is a single point of failure.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:13:20 -0700
From: Roeland Meyer <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: [ga] archives of the domain policy list

I've been looking for them myself, no joy. If you find them, please let me
know. I will put them up a DNSO.NET (being overhauled right now).

- -----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:46 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [ga] archives of the domain policy list

Now that VRSN removed them, does anyone maintain archives of the
domain-policy list, specifically from the 1998 era? 
- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:39:30 -0400
From: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] FW: Embargos and proscriptions

> |> Almost all of these entail defense and munitions.

Ummm.. no, there are much broader U.S. sanctions against doing business of
practically any kind with certain countries, and this information may be
found at:

http://www.treas.gov/ofac/

I don't see how U.S. domain name registrars can argue they are exempt from
certain of these restrictions (e.g., whois - uruklink.net )

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:44:07 -0400
From: Joanna Lane <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] Registrars Draft:  Transfers

on 9/20/01 2:07 PM, [email-masked] at [email-masked] wrote:

> Inter-Registrar Transfers Draft Document posted by the Registrar Constituency:
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc01/doc00057.doc

Thanks Danny,

Maybe I'm being dense, but with regard to the following paragraphs:-

"Losing Registrar minimum attribute check - Upon receipt of the transfer
announcement sent by the registry, the Losing Registrar may undertake to
check that the domain registration is not subject to one of the following
conditions:

Situations described in the Domain Dispute Resolution Policy
A pending bankruptcy of the Registered Name holder
Dispute over the identity of the Registered Name holder
Request to transfer sponsorship occurs in the first 60 days after the
initial registration with the Registrar.

Losing Registrar denies transfer - If the registration pending transfer
possesses any, or any number of, the aforementioned attributes, the Losing
Registrar may deny the transfer request in accordance with the relevant
Registry Agreement."

Why does the Losing Registrar need to know whether the Domain is in a UDRP
situation, or more important, whether the Registered Name Holder is pending
bankrupcy? Surely, as long as the Losing Registrar's bills are paid, and the
Domain will still be subject to the same UDRP procedures whoever the gaining
Registrar may be, it's none of their business? It seems to me another reason
for delay, also an intrusion of privacy into a Registrant's personal
affairs. Anyway, how on earth can a Registrar check whether a foreign
national is subject to a pending bankrupcy?

Regards,
Joanna 

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rick H Wesson <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: [ga] archives of the domain policy list

looks like I've only got 04/99 to 06/01

- -rick

On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:

> I've been looking for them myself, no joy. If you find them, please let me
> know. I will put them up a DNSO.NET (being overhauled right now).
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:46 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [ga] archives of the domain policy list
>
>
> Now that VRSN removed them, does anyone maintain archives of the
> domain-policy list, specifically from the 1998 era?
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:04:37 -0500
From: Andy Gardner <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: [ga] archives of the domain policy list

At 1:50 PM -0700 20/9/01, Rick H Wesson wrote:
>looks like I've only got 04/99 to 06/01

I seem to recall Ron Bennett having an archive somewhere?

- -- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:15:26 EDT
From: [email-masked]
Subject: [ga] rolling up the sleeves.

- --part1_a1.1b850b3a.28dbb66e_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Greetings all!

Sotiris Sotiropoulos reporting Captain Younger!  I've had some trouble 
sending mail to the list from my other email account, so I've re-subscribed 
under this new address.

I am looking forward to rolling up my sleeves...

BTW, offhand, I wonder if anyone might happen to know how many .biz 
registrations the NeuLevel registry has taken in the so-called "sunrise" 
period so far?

Sincerely,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos

- --part1_a1.1b850b3a.28dbb66e_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2>Greetings all!
<BR>
<BR>Sotiris Sotiropoulos reporting Captain Younger! &nbsp;I've had some trouble sending mail to the list from my other email account, so I've re-subscribed under this new address.
<BR>
<BR>I am looking forward to rolling up my sleeves...
<BR>
<BR>BTW, offhand, I wonder if anyone might happen to know how many .biz registrations the NeuLevel registry has taken in the so-called "sunrise" period so far?
<BR>
<BR>Sincerely,
<BR>
<BR>Sotiris Sotiropoulos</FONT></HTML>

- --part1_a1.1b850b3a.28dbb66e_boundary--
- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:29:33 +0000
From: "Roberto Gaetano" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] A message from Stuart Lynn regarding the next ICANN meeting

Philip Sheppard wrote, quoting Stuart Lynn:
>
>Some of you  have enquired whether the ICANN Marina del Rey meeting
>will go forward as scheduled in November in the light of last week's
>tragic events in New York and Washington.
>

I have often complained about the excessive US-centrism of ICANN, therefore 
I hope that my statement will not been suspected of partisanship.

I believe that to cancel the ICANN meeting or to move it outside of the 
United States will be an insult to the memory of the thousands that are 
still buried under the ruins of the Twin Towers.
The ICANN meeting can and should give its contribution to defeat the 
terrorism by showing that the international Internet community is active, 
alive and well, is close to its members that are suffering more in this 
particular moment, and reaffirms the willingness to follow the path of peace 
and progress and not the path of war and fear.

Best regards
Roberto

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:54:04 -0700
From: Jeff Williams <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] A message from Stuart Lynn regarding the next ICANN meeting

Stuart, Roberto and all,

  I agree with Roberto that the next MDR meeting should not be postponed
or changed in any way as to the date or place.

  I would however suggest that additional security precautions be
strongly considered for this next MDR meeting.  Let's not make
such a gathering an easy target for terrorists.

  On another of Roberto's comments, (See below) I must say that now,
the way to peace is going to be through war.  Sept 11th made that necessary.
Until or unless the high level of threat from terrorists is reduced
significantly
or all together, the opportunity for escalation from fanatic religious and
other Ideological groups is extremely dangerous to us all....

Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> Philip Sheppard wrote, quoting Stuart Lynn:
> >
> >Some of you  have enquired whether the ICANN Marina del Rey meeting
> >will go forward as scheduled in November in the light of last week's
> >tragic events in New York and Washington.
> >
>
> I have often complained about the excessive US-centrism of ICANN, therefore
> I hope that my statement will not been suspected of partisanship.
>
> I believe that to cancel the ICANN meeting or to move it outside of the
> United States will be an insult to the memory of the thousands that are
> still buried under the ruins of the Twin Towers.
> The ICANN meeting can and should give its contribution to defeat the
> terrorism by showing that the international Internet community is active,
> alive and well, is close to its members that are suffering more in this
> particular moment, and reaffirms the willingness to follow the path of peace
> and progress and not the path of war and fear.
>
> Best regards
> Roberto
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

- --
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email-masked]
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:12:05 -0700
From: Roeland Meyer <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: [ga] FW: Embargos and proscriptions

|> From: John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. [mailto:[email-masked]]
|> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:40 PM
|> 
|> > |> Almost all of these entail defense and munitions.
|> 
|> Ummm.. no, there are much broader U.S. sanctions against 
|> doing business of
|> practically any kind with certain countries, and this 
|> information may be
|> found at:

Erhem, keyword = "almost".

|> http://www.treas.gov/ofac/

Thanks for the additional link.

|> I don't see how U.S. domain name registrars can argue they 
|> are exempt from
|> certain of these restrictions (e.g., whois - uruklink.net )

In case you missed it, I agree with you.
- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:27:53 EDT
From: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [ga] A message from Stuart Lynn regarding the next ICANN meeting

In a message dated 9/20/01 7:15:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email-masked] writes:

<<  I would however suggest that additional security precautions be
 strongly considered for this next MDR meeting.  Let's not make
 such a gathering an easy target for terrorists. >>

would such security measures include protection of court papers being served 
to visiting registrars named in the .biz lottery suit....or is this still the 
U.S.?  I think still the U.S., so look for this meeting to be moved.

Ray
- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:47:39 -0400
From: "Peter de Blanc" <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: [ga] Geographic and Geopolitical Names in .info

In the Virgin Islands, we use  .gov.vi   like senate.gov.vi  , etc.

Peter de Blanc

- -----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Andy
Gardner
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:31 PM
To: Sandy Harris; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [ga] Geographic and Geopolitical Names in .info

New Zealand uses govt.nz

- -

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:16:16 -0700
From: Jeff Williams <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] A message from Stuart Lynn regarding the next ICANN meeting

Ray and all assembly members,

[email-masked] wrote:

> In a message dated 9/20/01 7:15:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [email-masked] writes:
>
> <<  I would however suggest that additional security precautions be
>  strongly considered for this next MDR meeting.  Let's not make
>  such a gathering an easy target for terrorists. >>
>
> would such security measures include protection of court papers being served
> to visiting registrars named in the .biz lottery suit....or is this still the
> U.S.?

  It is still the USA, THANK GOD!  But no, there is no need to restrain
the protection of court papers being served.  In fact, the security measures
I am calling for are of a physical nature.

>  I think still the U.S., so look for this meeting to be moved.

  I hope not.  Such a move would be sending the wrong message,
and would be succumbing to fear.  I feel that this is NOT a good
idea...

>
>
> Ray

Regards,

- --
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email-masked]
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 19:41:38 -0700
From: William X Walsh <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] Registrars Draft:  Transfers

Thursday, Thursday, September 20, 2001, 1:44:07 PM, Joanna Lane wrote:

> Why does the Losing Registrar need to know whether the Domain is in a UDRP
> situation, or more important, whether the Registered Name Holder is pending
> bankrupcy? Surely, as long as the Losing Registrar's bills are paid, and the
> Domain will still be subject to the same UDRP procedures whoever the gaining
> Registrar may be, it's none of their business? It seems to me another reason
> for delay, also an intrusion of privacy into a Registrant's personal
> affairs. Anyway, how on earth can a Registrar check whether a foreign
> national is subject to a pending bankrupcy?

These parts of the "rules" are not new, they are in the existing
policies as well.  It provides for a reason why the losing registrar
may deny a transfer, not that they are obligated to do so.

Remember, the UDRP provides that someone filing legal actin may do so
in the jurisdiction of the registrar, so a change of registrars during
a UDRP proceeding would change the entire dynamics of the process.
(By the way, I strongly disagree with that provision of the UDRP).

- -- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <[email-masked]>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 19:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dierker <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] To: [email-masked]

Danny,

I hate to be critical :>}

But you are the chair, a call to arms must have an agenda and appointment of 
people and suggest the proper 
use of infrastructure.  ie.

We will use the following sub-list .......

I hereby appoint  SS and ...... to chair the list ....

I set forth that consensus will be achieved by .....date  and it will be 
determined by informal free polling.  

Since the ALSC is handpicked I declare that know one else holding any other 
current position within ICONN may be on the WG, 
no matter how small may contribute as in tfs or wgs, however they may 
contribute through a member.

This will follow the structure of a WG, and other than aforementioned there 
shall be no censorship and or 
limitation of posts.

I (you) reccomend the following;

appoint a scribe,
Watch the GA and ALSC lists
Ask for input from experts
Report every Monday to the GA full
Assign immediately ten threads/topics and keep the rule
Assign a researcher to each thread

Then watch and if does not get done assign people to fulfill the function 
yourself.
Do not limit cross posting to other lists, in order to garner quick input.

anonymous

[email-masked] wrote:

  Greetings all!

  Sotiris Sotiropoulos reporting Captain Younger!  I've had some trouble 
sending mail to the list from my other 
  email account, so I've re-subscribed under this new address.

  I am looking forward to rolling up my sleeves...

  BTW, offhand, I wonder if anyone might happen to know how many .biz 
registrations the NeuLevel registry has 
  taken in the so-called "sunrise" period so far?

  Sincerely,

  Sotiris Sotiropoulos

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dierker <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [ga] Registrars Draft:  Transfers

Bill my friend,

Get a law degree!  Read Erie and a slew of other long arms statute cases 
then review a bunch more causation cases with opinions written by Cordoza, 
but don't do any of that until you are capable of passing a bar (no not the 
dew drop in kind).  Giving opinions on jurisdiction without proper training 
is really wrong especially when you are wrong.

The bottom line is always:  piss a judge off bad enough and then never 
appear in his jurisdiction again.

> Thursday, Thursday, September 20, 2001, 1:44:07 PM, Joanna Lane wrote:
> 
>> Why does the Losing Registrar need to know whether the Domain is in a
>> UDRP situation, or more important, whether the Registered Name Holder
>> is pending bankrupcy? Surely, as long as the Losing Registrar's bills
>> are paid, and the Domain will still be subject to the same UDRP
>> procedures whoever the gaining Registrar may be, it's none of their
>> business? It seems to me another reason for delay, also an intrusion
>> of privacy into a Registrant's personal affairs. Anyway, how on earth
>> can a Registrar check whether a foreign national is subject to a
>> pending bankrupcy?
> 
> These parts of the "rules" are not new, they are in the existing
> policies as well.  It provides for a reason why the losing registrar
> may deny a transfer, not that they are obligated to do so.
> 
> Remember, the UDRP provides that someone filing legal actin may do so
> in the jurisdiction of the registrar, so a change of registrars during
> a UDRP proceeding would change the entire dynamics of the process. (By
> the way, I strongly disagree with that provision of the UDRP).
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <[email-masked]>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

End of GA-DIGEST V1 #750
************************