Subject: GA-DIGEST V1 #196
From: [email-masked] (GA-DIGEST)
To: [email-masked]

GA-DIGEST          Sunday, November 19 2000          Volume 01 : Number 196

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 15:43:28 -0500
From: "Ben Edelman" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] FW: UPDATE: ICANN-LA Meetings Complete, Archive Now Available

In my haste to catch a plane yesterday, I failed to forward this
announcement to the GA.

(I did send it to all preregistered and actual participants and remote
participants, though -- some 1500+ folks total!)

My apologies for the delay.

Ben Edelman
Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Harvard Law School

- -----Original Message-----
From: Ben Edelman [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 7:31 PM
To: Registrants for ICANN-LA Meetings
Subject: UPDATE: ICANN-LA Meetings Complete, Archive Now Available

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because you attended or registered to attend
ICANN's public meetings in Los Angeles, California (November 13-16) in
person or via webcast.

Today's ICANN Board Meeting is now complete, and archives of this session,
yesterday's Public Forum, and Tuesday's DNSO meetings have been posted in
the online meeting archive at
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/la2000/archive>.  Archives include
RealVideo archives, agendas, scribe's notes, documents and presentations
used, real-time questions received, and online discussion logs.

Finally, if you're not already subscribed to ICANN's announcements list, you
may find it helpful to join in order to receive important future
announcements from ICANN.  See
<http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcements.htm> for instructions.

Ben Edelman
Berkman Center for Internet and Society
Harvard Law School

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 19:10:15 -0500
From: "Dennis Schaefer" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] [ADMIN] Suspension of William X. Walsh

It is undoubtedly within Harald's discretion to make this finding.

Nevertheless, I do not find it a reasonable decision, and I'm very
uncomfortable with it.

I hold Joop in the highest esteem, and I usually admire Harald's reasoning.
Nevertheless, William's remark was a simple fact.   If a list is not public,
no one else can verify its validity.

Dennis Schaefer
Marblehead, MA

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Joop Teernstra" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 7:40 AM
Subject: RE: [ga] [ADMIN] Suspension of William X. Walsh

> At 21:22 15/11/00 +1100, Dassa wrote:
>
> >I am also very surprised the complaint was lodged over such a
> >paragraph.  I have seen both Joop and WXW indulge in more heated
> >discussions, together and with others.  I have also seen worse on this
> >list from others.
>
> This surprised me too. The paragraph was chosen by the monitor out of two
> sentences that demonstrated a pattern of personal attacks.
> You see how difficult it is to be a judge and jury at the same time.
>
> An offlist vote offloads this burden from the moderator's shoulders.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:34:30 +1300
From: Joop Teernstra <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] [ADMIN] Suspension of William X. Walsh

At 19:10 15/11/00 -0500, Dennis Schaefer wrote:
>It is undoubtedly within Harald's discretion to make this finding.
>
>Nevertheless, I do not find it a reasonable decision, and I'm very
>uncomfortable with it.
>
>I hold Joop in the highest esteem, and I usually admire Harald's reasoning.
>Nevertheless, William's remark was a simple fact.   If a list is not public,
>no one else can verify its validity.

Dennis,
the list of IDNO members *is* public and it truthfully lists new signups in
chronological sequence.  Many new members provide links to their websites.
See www.idno.org/members.htm 

- --Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  
the Cyberspace Association and 
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
Elected representative.
http://www.idno.org  

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

End of GA-DIGEST V1 #196
************************