Subject: GA-DIGEST V1 #1682
From: [email-masked] (GA-DIGEST)
To: [email-masked]

GA-DIGEST            Saturday, May 3 2003            Volume 01 : Number 1682

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 15:30:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marc Schneiders <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] Registrars' Constituency

Does anyone have a more recent list of the registrars' constituency's
membership than the one published on the registrars constituency's
website, which is of 2001?

http://www.icann-registrars.org/excelldocs/Registrars%20Constituency%20Member%20List.xls

Thanks!

Marc

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 15:54:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marc Schneiders <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] Intellectual Property Constituency

Am I not looking properly at the IPC website? I cannot find any list
of members of the Intellectual Property Constituency. From election
results of last year, I can calculate that there are 34 cat 2 and 3
members. Is there more public info available that I overlooked?

Thanks!

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:31:19 -0500
From: "Jim Fleming" <[email-masked]>
Subject: http://www.domain.shop...Re: [ga] Registrars' Constituency

Have you checked....?
http://www.domain.shop
http://www.domain.shop.new.net

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marc Schneiders" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 8:30 AM
Subject: [ga] Registrars' Constituency

> Does anyone have a more recent list of the registrars' constituency's
> membership than the one published on the registrars constituency's
> website, which is of 2001?
> 
> http://www.icann-registrars.org/excelldocs/Registrars%20Constituency%20Member%20List.xls
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Marc
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:43:50 -0500
From: "Jim Fleming" <[email-masked]>
Subject: http://www.public.info...Re: [ga] Intellectual Property Constituency

From: "Marc Schneiders" <[email-masked]>
Is there more public info available that I overlooked?

=====================================

http://www.public.info

www.public.info 

Is AVAILABLE to BUY or RENT !

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marc Schneiders" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 8:54 AM
Subject: [ga] Intellectual Property Constituency

> Am I not looking properly at the IPC website? I cannot find any list
> of members of the Intellectual Property Constituency. From election
> results of last year, I can calculate that there are 34 cat 2 and 3
> members. Is there more public info available that I overlooked?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:50:14 -0500
From: "Jim Fleming" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] 0:253     WEB

http://www.webtld.com/
http://www.gtld-mou.org/docs/rfc-results.htm#97-02
Therefore, the revised names of new gTLDs are: .firm for businesses, or firms  
      .shop for businesses offering goods to purchase 
      .web  for entities emphasizing activities related to the World Wide Web 
      .arts for entities emphasizing cultural and entertainment activities 
      .rec for entities emphasizing recreation/entertainment activities 
      .info for entities providing information services 
      .nom for those wishing individual or personal nomenclature, i.e., a personal nom de plume 

===============================================================
http://www.webtld.com/
0:253     WEB

Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rick Wesson <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] Registrars' Constituency

how about this list http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids

- -rick

On Fri, 2 May 2003, Marc Schneiders wrote:

> Does anyone have a more recent list of the registrars' constituency's
> membership than the one published on the registrars constituency's
> website, which is of 2001?
>
> http://www.icann-registrars.org/excelldocs/Registrars%20Constituency%20Member%20List.xls
>
> Thanks!
>
> Marc
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 19:49:12 +0200
From: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [ga] 0:242     SHOP...Monday 05/05/03

but www.sex.shop , www.health.shop and many others has been renewed till
2005

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Fleming" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 3:08 PM
Subject: [ga] 0:242 SHOP...Monday 05/05/03

> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> 0:242     SHOP
> =================
> http://www.iahc.org/press/press-final.html
> "SEVEN NEW TOP LEVEL DOMAIN NAMES ARE ADDED FOR INTERNET ADDRESSES AND UP
TO 28 NEW REGISTRARS PLANNED"
> http://www.iahc.org/draft-iahc-recommend-00.html
> Final Report...
> http://www.gtld-mou.org/docs/iahc.html
> "Modification of the gTLD .store to .shop following a public request for
comments reviewing the chosen names"
>
> http://new.chat.new.net/viewtopic.php?t=118
> DAY 10 (Monday 05/05/03)
> .SHOP
> =================
> Registrars...
> http://www.easyspace.com/
> http://www.BulkRegister.com
> http://www.RegisterFly.com
> http://www.DollarDomainName.com
> http://www.thepricedomain.com/
>
> http://new.chat.new.net/viewtopic.php?t=165
>             Below are a sample of expired .SHOP domains scheduled to be
released Monday May 5, 2003:
>
>             videogame.shop
>             candle.shop
>             accessory.shop
>             reise.shop
>             alpha.shop
>             homebrew.shop
>             yahoo.shop
>             strategy.shop
>             bid.shop
>             record.shop
>             247.shop
>             cell.shop
>             itv.shop
>             specialty.shop
>             search.shop
>             jewellery.shop
>             technology.shop
>             discount.shop
>             florist.shop
>             name.shop
>             shoppingcart.shop
>             photo.shop
>             websitedesign.shop
>             girls.shop
>             digital.shop
>             jewerly.shop
>             jewelery.shop
>             camel.shop
>             msn.shop
>             artsandcrafts.shop
>             bakery.shop
>             coke.shop
>             bikini.shop
>             collector.shop
>             digicam.shop
>             motorcycle.shop
>             condom.shop
>             download.shop
>             closeout.shop
>             apparel.shop
>             videogames.shop
>             drugstore.shop
>             palm.shop
>             magic.shop
>             hot.shop
>             dreamcar.shop
>             brasil.shop
>             condoms.shop
>             privacy.shop
>             sun.shop
>             entertainment.shop
>             jeweler.shop
>             property.shop
>             gladys.shop
>             suv.shop
>             africa.shop
>             bmw.shop
>             mercedes.shop
>             liquor.shop
>             cheap.shop
>             stpats.shop
>             rugs.shop
>             binoculars.shop
>             teen.shop
>             furniture.shop
>             guitar.shop
>             windsurf.shop
>             lingerie.shop
>             big.shop
>             herbs.shop
>             vegetarian.shop
>             cdr.shop
>             apple.shop
>             ozarkcrafts.shop
>             world.shop
>             sewing.shop
>             sweat.shop
>             vw.shop
>             cellphone.shop
>             bulbs.shop
>             abath.shop
>             lightbulb.shop
>             thegolf.shop
>             polka.shop
>             boys.shop
>             dkny.shop
>             bananarepublic.shop
>             bowling.shop
>             israeltravel.shop
>             eyedoctors.shop
>             stamp.shop
>             skiing.shop
>             snack.shop
>             onestop.shop
>             light.shop
>             webdomains.shop
>             eyedoctor.shop
>             brazil.shop
>             golfshirts.shop
>             smile.shop
>             gucci.shop
>
======================================================================
>
>
>
>
> Jim Fleming
> http://www.IPv8.info
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> 0:242     SHOP
>
>

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 21:41:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marc Schneiders <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: [ga] Adam Peake elected to Board?

On Thu, 1 May 2003, at 23:55 [=GMT-0400], Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> In my view, Alejandro did not need to be nominated separately.  That is not
> spin, but the truth. In addition, I have been following the NCUC discussion
> and Mr. Peake has declined his nomination.  I am not sure if this has
> changed since his last posting.
>
> Danny, there is no conspiracy here.

I think you are right about that. On the other hand, it is a bit of a
pity, that Dr. Pisanty is elected without any opponent(s). He is the major
architec and builder of the ERC. It would not have been bad, if he had
been given an opportunity to explain and defend his role, and give us an
idea about his plans for the future of ICANN in a debating context.

A lost opportunity. For all of us.

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 14:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dierker <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: [ga] Apathy

This is a strange concept built upon lack of leadership or difined goals.
It would appear to me that here it is a depression/malaise concept.
I know that as a member of the BOD of ICANN it is unpopular to like 
Alejandro but I do and wish him best of luck.
This lack of caring seems to me to reflect a satisfaction with the status 
quo. No?
e

> On Thu, 1 May 2003, at 23:55 [=GMT-0400], Neuman, Jeff wrote:
> 
>> In my view, Alejandro did not need to be nominated separately.  That
>> is not spin, but the truth. In addition, I have been following the
>> NCUC discussion and Mr. Peake has declined his nomination.  I am not
>> sure if this has changed since his last posting.
>>
>> Danny, there is no conspiracy here.
> 
> I think you are right about that. On the other hand, it is a bit of a
> pity, that Dr. Pisanty is elected without any opponent(s). He is the
> major architec and builder of the ERC. It would not have been bad, if
> he had been given an opportunity to explain and defend his role, and
> give us an idea about his plans for the future of ICANN in a debating
> context.
> 
> A lost opportunity. For all of us.
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 18:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Karl Auerbach <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] Adam Peake elected to Board?

On Fri, 2 May 2003, Richard Henderson wrote:

> Re-introduce the one-person-one-vote election of At Large representatives.
 
> Insist on an independent ombudsman.

A Director is supposed to fill that role - it is the duty of a Director to 
inquire into the activities of the corporation and make independent 
judgements.

It is amazing how ICANN fell for the claim that a person who is an
employee with the title "ombudsman" - a person who's power, and salary,
derives entirely from papers that can be changed by his/her employer -
would have more independent power than a Director who derives his/her
power from State and Federal statutes and from case law.

So rather than insisting on an indepdent ombudsman, you ought to insist on 
Directors who understand and pursue their legal obligations.

		--karl--

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 13:45:19 +1200
From: Joop Teernstra <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] Intellectual Property Constituency

At 01:54 a.m. 3/05/2003, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>Am I not looking properly at the IPC website? I cannot find any list
>of members of the Intellectual Property Constituency. From election
>results of last year, I can calculate that there are 34 cat 2 and 3
>members. Is there more public info available that I overlooked?

This old list of email addresses, dating from slightly more transparent 
days ('98?)is all I could find. Most have recognizable names. Not sure if 
all are members.

[email-masked];
[email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
 > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];

[email-masked] is none other than William X. Walsh.

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 05:21:55 -0500
From: "Jim Fleming" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] Market-based address allocation ?

http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg09658.html
"Market-based address allocation"
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg09634.html
"The US Department of Defense (AS 568) wins the prize for the most
unregistered network blocks being announced."
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg09739.html
"How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized?"
=====================================
As long as people use the 0:0 .ARPA address space, they will be subject to the 
http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
======================================
Have no fear..."This is all run by government money, essentially."
> http://www.isi.edu/news/LABJSchorr.html
> "ISI was formed in 1972 to manage and research the ARPAnet"
> "Prior to joining ISI, Schorr spent more than 30 years in various engineering and management positions at IBM."
> "We're a spinout from Rand."
> "We're sort of between a corporate laboratory and a university..."
> "You know what ICANN is? That's in this building as we speak."
> "We ran IANA, which was the predecessor to ICANN."
> "This is all run by government money, essentially. So we're constantly looking for contracts."
> "Each person has an "agent" (an artificial intelligence program), and all the agents exchange information (via the Internet)."
>
================================

The owners of IN-ADDR.[TLD] should be able to maintain their "ownership" of their address space.

Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 08:57:00 -0500
From: "Jim Fleming" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] Are you on the AM Internet or the FM InterNAT ?

http://www.wiana.org
"IPv4 style addresses in the 1.x.x.x range."
http://www.ampr.org/amprnet.html
"IPv4 Network 44/8 is known as the AMPRNet, named from "AMateur Packet Radio Network". "
=======================

Are you on the AM Internet or the FM InterNAT ?

128-bit DNS AAAA Record Flag Day Formats
2003:[IPv4]:[SDLL.OFFF.FFFF.TTTT]:[64-bit IPv8 or IPv16 Persistent Address]
[YMDD]:[IPv4]:[SDLL.OFFF.FFFF.TTTT]:[64-bit IPv8 or IPv16 Persistent Address]
1-bit to set the Reserved/Spare ("AM/FM") bit in Fragment Offset [S]
1-bit to set the Don't Fragment (DF) bit [D]
2-bits to select 1 of 4 common TTL values (255, 128, 32, 8) [LL]
1-bit for Options Control [O]
7-bits to set the Identification Field(dst) [FFFFFFF]
4-bits to set the TOS(dst) Field [TTTT]
Default SDLL.OFFF.FFFF.TTTT = 0000.0000.0000.0000
FFF.FFFF.TTTT = GGG.SSSS.SSSS
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
IPv8
0QQQQGGGSSSSSSSS[32-bits][Port]
IPv16
0QQQQGGGSSSSSSSS[32-bits][Port]
1AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA[32-bits][Port]
A...A=ASN=32769...65535

Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

End of GA-DIGEST V1 #1682
*************************