Subject: GA-DIGEST V1 #1654
From: [email-masked] (GA-DIGEST)
To: [email-masked]

GA-DIGEST           Saturday, April 5 2003           Volume 01 : Number 1654

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:16:17 -0600
From: "Jim Fleming" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] 3:63 NL   (NETHERLANDS) Liberated...France Still Missing in Action...

http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
3:63 NL   (NETHERLANDS)

> 
> ; <<>> DiG 9.1.3 <<>> in-addr.nl any
> ;; global options:  printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15501
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0
> 
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;in-addr.nl. IN ANY
> 
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> in-addr.nl. 345600 IN NS ns.bit.nl.
> in-addr.nl. 345600 IN NS ns2.bit.nl.
> 
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> in-addr.nl. 345600 IN NS ns.bit.nl.
> in-addr.nl. 345600 IN NS ns2.bit.nl.
> 
> ;; Query time: 1 msec
> ;; SERVER: 192.168.0.1#53(192.168.0.1)
> ;; WHEN: Thu Apr  3 10:58:07 2003
> ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 95
> 

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 18:13:23 -0800
From: Jeff Williams <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [ga] 0:152     CASINO...http://www.Montreal.CASINO...http://www.icann.org/montreal/

Jim and all former DNSO GA members,

  Just before the quote you provided in the archived Registrars
ML, Ross also said: "At the very least the motion should be
amended to simply indicate support for an examination
of the privacy implications of the existing whois policy and
promote a discussion amongst registrars of proposals
that might address the problems we perceive as being
pressing."

  If you ask any reasonable person, this would sound more like
a "politically Correct" statement and post from Ross than one
that would honestly understand the implications of Privacy.
Pure milk toast Ross!

Jim Fleming wrote:

> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc02/msg00954.html
> From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email-masked]>
> "I want to see the datamining stop just as much as anyone - we have the
> second most to lose."
> ====
>
> What do you plan to do about TLD-mining ?
>
> As you are likely aware, the aging, legacy, IPv4 Internet is an ideal sand-box for the market development of TLDs.
> When those TLDs reach a point where they are of interest to the serious InterNAT commercial providers, all of
> the customers of the particular TLD will be invited to re-register to make sure they have both 32-bit DNS and
> 128-bit DNS. This would be like making sure one's name works in DOS as well as Windows.
>
> .COM and .NET are certainly at a point where there is commercial interest. Taking .CA as an example, there are
> only 300,000 customers, therefore, it is not of commercial interest because 3,000,000 names appears to be the
> threshold where that interest begins. If the free marketplace is allowed to flourish, studies show that each **premium** TLD
> will have about 50,000 customers. One can do the math as to how many hundreds of dollars it will cost each
> customer per year per name, at such low volumes. Lawyers seem to think under $1,000 and over $500 is the
> region where they can make a profit, and fund their tuxedos and play in the private bacharach parties.
>
> The black-tie affairs in June in Montreal should be interesting...
>
> 0:152     CASINO
> http://www.icann.org/montreal/
> http://www.Montreal.CASINO
> http://www.casino-de-montreal.com/langue_cm_fla.htm
>
> Jim Fleming
> http://www.IPv8.info
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
> Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regardes,
- --
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 129k members/stakeholders strong!)
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email-masked]
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 21:43:23 -0600
From: "Jim Fleming" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [ga] Re: [Anuncios] 201/8 Allocated by IANA to LACNIC

What is or was the annual revenue for that /8 ?

Do ALL /8 franchisees pay the same amount to ICANN each year ?
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space

===========================================================

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John L Crain" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 2:23 PM
Subject: [Anuncios] 201/8 Allocated by IANA to LACNIC

> Hi Folks,
> 
> This is a heads up to let you know that the IANA has alloacted the
> following range of IPv4 addresses to LACNIC.
> 
> 201.0.0.0/8
> 
> A notation of the allocation has been made at
> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space>.
> 
> You may wish to adjust your filters accordingly.
>   
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
>  John                          mailto:[email-masked]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anuncios mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://www.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/anuncios

- --
This message was passed to you via the [email-masked] list.
Send mail to [email-masked] to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------------------------------

End of GA-DIGEST V1 #1654
*************************